My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP36827
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP36827
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 12:15:02 AM
Creation date
11/27/2007 7:36:03 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977215
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
4/30/1996
Doc Name
BULLDOG PROJECT MINERAL CNTY CO LOWER TAILINGS POND REMEDIATION SUMMARY REPORT
From
HOMESTAKE
To
DMG
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
59
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Homestake Mining Company -Bulldog Mine-Lower Tailing Pond <br />' 3.0 Data/Information/Assessment <br />3.1 Lower Tailings Impoundment Remediation Work <br />' Slurry Cutoff Wall and Pump Back System <br />' The 1982 remedial activities included the construction of a soil/bentonite slurry cut-off <br />wall down gradient from the Lower Tailings Impoundment to intercept surface flow and <br />' ground water seepage. Seepage trapped by the slurry wall was forced into a concrete <br />collection trench and sump. To facilitate seepage collection around the sump, clean <br />crushed rock was placed below the sump bottom and approximately six feet azound the <br />' sump circumference. To further aide seepage collection, six inch diameter perforated <br />pipes, surrounded with filter cloth and crushed rock, were connected to the sump and <br />extended 100 feet east and 150 feet west side of the sump, perpendiculaz to the <br />' collection trench. The seepage collected was then returned to the impoundment via a <br />pump-back system consisting of two- 10 HP turbine pumps with an individual capacity of <br />175 gpm and a six inch diameter return line, laid along the east side of the stream <br />' channel, through the embankment to the tailing pond. <br />The performance of the cut-off wall and pumpback system was assessed through the <br />' evaluation of seepage collection rates and changes in the down-gradient water conditions. <br />Monitoring well WP25 showed a decline in the water level of three feet within three <br />month of the remedial activities. However, adjacent wells did not reflect a similaz <br />' fluctuation in water levels. At the completion of construction, the pump-back system was <br />returning water to the pond at a rate of 95 gpm; this increased to 130 gpm by October <br />1983. It was noted in the February 1983 Construction As-Built Report that the ground <br />' water quality in the monitoring wells below the stony cut-off wall began to improve after <br />the remedial construction. <br />' Test Grouting Program <br />The 1982 test grouting program was intended to be an investigative tool to determine <br />t whether grouting could significantly reduce seepage beneath the embankment. Grouting <br />was performed in the permeable rock and alluvial fill beneath the embankment. The <br />initial program consisted of six holes spaced approximately 30 feet apart across the <br />' embankment followed by three additional holes spaced half way between the initial <br />holes. All holes were completed into the Creede Formation. The grout consisted of a <br />' water and cement mixture varying from a 4:1 to 1: l ratio. In addition, a chemical grout <br />mixture was also tested. Most of the grout take occurred in the alluvial soil at a depth of <br />80-90 feet below the embankment crest. [n this area the grout take approached 130 cu. <br />' feet of grout per foot. The average grout take was 12 cubic feet per foot with the rock in <br />the weathered zone neaz the interface with the alluvial soil taking more grout than the <br />more competent rock. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.