My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP36304
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP36304
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 12:14:08 AM
Creation date
11/27/2007 7:24:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981028
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Doc Name
1999 AHR & ARR VEGETATION
Annual Report Year
1999
Permit Index Doc Type
HYDROLOGY REPORT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
47
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
dominated by herbaceous species appeaz to respond much more rapidly to changes in the <br />ambient precipitation regime than those communities dominated by shrubs or trees. <br />Mean total vegetation cover was variable this season ranging from 33.40 percent to 50.20 <br />percent (Table li). The areas exhibiting the lowest mean total vegetation cover during <br />the 1999 sampling were the 1995 reclamation areas with 33.40 percent total vegetative <br />cover. The 1998 reseeded or interseeded areas exhibited the highest level of total <br />vegetation cover with 46.40 percent. This result is not unexpected given the fact that the <br />1998 areas had been previously seeded to the permanent revegetation mix and some <br />growth had already developed. <br />HERBACEOUS PRODUCTION <br />As with vegetation cover, total herbaceous production was quite variable during the 1999 <br />growing season (Table 11). Mean herbaceous production ranged from 67.44 g/m2 to <br />127.05 g/m2. The 1995 reclamation areas exhibited the highest mean herbaceous <br />production and the 1998 reseeded or interseeded areas exhibited the lowest mean <br />herbaceous production. Interestingly, mean herbaceous production on the Osgood sand <br />reference area dropped 21.0 percent from the 1998 herbaceous production level. The <br />1995 reclamation areas experienced a 16.9 percent increase during the same time period. <br />Perennial grasses dominated total herbaceous production in the two oldest vegetation <br />communities, the Osgood sand reference area and the 1995 reclamation areas, accounting <br />for 89.5 percent and 72.1 percent of the total herbaceous production, respectively. In the <br />remaining areas sampled, lifeform contributions to the herbaceous production were nearly <br />equally distributed between perennial grasses, annual forbs, and perennial forbs (1997 <br />reclamation areas), or perennial grasses, annual grasses, and annual forbs (1998 reseeded <br />or in[erseeded areas). These apparent discrepancies may be explained by the large <br />contributions of Bromus ieclorum, Helian~hus annuus, and Ambrosia psiloslachya in the <br />younger areas. The increased levels of early season precipitation undoubtedly aided in the <br />development of these cool season species. <br />SPECIES COMPOSITION <br />The Colorado Division of Minerals and Geology considers species composition of the <br />revegetated and reclaimed areas to be an indicator of successful vegetation establishment <br />and a diverse vegetation community. A standard has been set by CDMG for the <br />evaluation of species composition at [he Keenesburg Mine. To be judged successful, at <br />final bond release, this standard requires that, "the species composition on the reclaimed <br />area is such that there are at least seven perennial species of which four are warm season <br />grasses and one is a forb. No one component of the above species should comprise <br />greater than 40% relative importance nor less than 3% relative importance. Relative <br />importance will be measured by calculating relative cover of the revegetation species. <br />Vegetation species which may be used in the calculation of species composition may be <br />any plant species not defined as a noxious or prohibited plant species, and may be native <br />_17_ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.