Laserfiche WebLink
• ~~ <br />~C~Hf1~~1~~ d ~f IIA~~G® <br />• ,~ <br />A ~ /~ /~ ,t~omuo, n rah, <br />" `,P C.o~e~tructioh C,o. ~~ <br />_ ....r,,.,., - <br />2675 DELTA DRIVE COLORADO SPRINGS, COLORAD080910 ~ ~ ~tl34~/1- <br />CHRISTIAN PIT AREA #1 APR 0 1 1982 <br />RESPONSES To RvLE z.41: PAINED LAND RECLAMATION <br />Colo. Dept. of f~atural ResoL~rces <br />Rule 2.41(1): Location and number of acres affected during that year. <br />It is very difficult to identify the precise area operated during any particular year. <br />The areas were rather small and tended to merge into each other in irregular fashions <br />along the working face of the pit. As was stated in the introduction this operation is <br />over the 1976 permit boundary. This amounts to 47.7 acres of affected land. The attached <br />map shows the area beyond the permit boundary. <br />Rule 2.41(2): Locations and number of acres reclaimed for that year. <br />In 1979, 8.3 acres were seeded on the north side of the operation. Apparently this was <br />part of the land released from bond in 1979. <br />Rule 2.41(3): The location and number of acres in various stages of reclamation (back- <br />filled, graded, topsoil replaced, revegetated). <br />On the south side of the operation there is 2.5 acres covered in the topsoil stockpile. <br />On the north side of the operation there is 3.3 acres that has been graded and topsoiled <br />but has not been seeded. <br />Rule 2.41(4): The species of vegetation planted, the locations and approximate dates <br />of planting. <br />In 1979, 45.9 acres were seeded by Randall and Blake. This is the only seeding that has <br />occurred since the 1976 permit was approved. The attached letter from Arkansas Valley <br />Seeds, Inc. to Randall and Blake shows what was seeded and the seed analysis show the <br />quality of the seed. <br />Rule 2.41(5): The type and approximate quantity of fertilizers, organic material, or <br />soil conditioners used and location of use. <br />No record exists of what soil amendments were used on the seeding project. It can only <br />be assumed some fertilizer was applied. However, none was called for in the permitted <br />plan or in the S.C.S. recommendations. It appears this will have to remain an unknown <br />until some definite information is acquired. <br />