Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Page k. - <br />Annusl Report <br />Lamar Eaet Pit d'77-572 <br />Valco Inc. <br /> <br />4. We would estimn'te that a nex coat calculati~~n <br />for reclamation be based at X1000 per acre +rith <br />the total number of acres to be bonded to be <br />agreed upon between the Division and Yalco +ifter <br />coneoltation with each other. <br />5. Revision or amendments to the mining and re+:lam= <br />ation plan can be made ester the meeting between <br />the Division and Yelco. <br />BRAD JAMBS INSPECTION REPORT RESPONSE <br />1. A timetable for anaxering the Divisions concerns <br />is suggested as follows: <br />By May 31, 1983 -Determine the somber <br />of acres to be bonded. <br />By July 30, 1983 -Detenine the change <br />in mining plan, especially <br />for area east of railroad <br />bridge. <br />By Sept. 30, 1983 -Subait to the Division <br />aqy changes, revisions on <br />ammendaente to mining plan. <br />2. Pit xall reduction and revegetation of arena <br />Mr. ranee is referring to are not wined-out areas. <br />They are part of Stage 0 Part I. and II. that <br />contain Band and gravel deposits ihat are mineable. <br />Mr. Janes was not suers of this at the time of his <br />inspection because the study to determine the amount <br />sand amd gravel remaining in these stages xne not <br />completed and we assuaed the areas had been mined out. <br />I hope this response answers your questions. Please do not hesitate <br />to contact ae if I can be of further aaeietance. <br />Sincerely, <br />~~ <br />George Gregg <br />General Manager <br />Yalco Inc. <br />Lamar Concrete Division <br />