My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP35525
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP35525
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 12:12:50 AM
Creation date
11/27/2007 7:08:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1978305
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
5/18/2004
Doc Name
Environmental Assessment
From
Nat. Park Service
To
DMG
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
88
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Alternative B (Proposed Action) -Under this alternative, production would vary, depending <br />on market demands; however, the operator's proposed pian of operations estimated that <br />production could reach 800 to 1,000 tons per day. The proposed expansion would be done in a <br />phased approach, moving from one area of the pit to another, proceeding from the top down to <br />the pit floor. Mining would begin in one area of the remaining unmined portion of the pit, at the <br />highest elevation of the pit wall. Material would be removed down to approximately 50 vertical <br />feet below the beginning level. Once this material was removed and processed, mining would <br />proceed to a different area or phase. Mining would again proceed about 50 feet down, and then <br />operations would move to a different area and continue down the slope, and so forth, until the <br />pit floor is eventually reached at the 7,540 foot elevation. If the mining operation follows the <br />two phases shown in Figure 2.1, the amount of material removed and estimated time to do this <br />are summarized as follows: <br />PHASE 2A PHASE 2B <br />ACREAGE 7.725 11.8 <br />TOTAL TONS 340,000 620,000 <br />TOTAL TIME TO MINE OUT 4-12 years 8-20 years <br />Between phases, the park would monitor the operation to evaluate if the material mined <br />continues to consist of decomposed granite and intermixed materials and to ensure no <br />unforeseen adverse impacts are occurring. Monitoring of any archeological site recovery would <br />occur during all phases of mine operation. <br />2.5. Reclamation <br />Both alternatives would result in the eventual grading of the pit walls to a 2:1 slope and re- <br />establishment of a native vegetation cover on all disturbed areas. Specific measures are <br />included in the permit for Alternative A. Measures for Alternative B would include those <br />proposed by the operator in the Plan of Operations, plus additional measures required by the <br />NPS. Specific mitigation measures related to reclamation are listed in Tables 2.1 through 2.3. <br />The following summarizes the main features of the reclamation plans for each alternative. <br />Alternative A (No Action) -Topsoil would be stockpiled and saved for redistribution over the <br />disturbed area. This topsoil, plus any supplemental topsoil needed for adequate coverage, <br />would be placed across the disturbed area to a depth adequate for the establishment and <br />continued existence of the native vegetative communities found in the local area. The current <br />permit requires a depth of 6 inches. The site would be seeded for 2 consecutive years after <br />topsoil placement. Seed specifications would adhere to NPS recommendations and would be <br />reviewed and approved by the Superintendent. The operator must monitor and control exotic <br />species and noxious weeds between both seedings and for 2 years after the final seeding. <br />Reclamation activities must commence no later than 6 months following the conclusion of <br />mining and be completed within 2 years of commencement. <br />Alternative B (Proposed Action) -Reclamation procedures would generally follow the same <br />as those listed for Alternative A, but with some additional requirements to ensure that the final <br />appearance of the site blends into the surrounding landscape. The slopes would be graded to <br />achieve an overall slope of 2:1, but the slopes would be steepened or flattened randomly and <br />intermittently to simulate the irregularity of the existing terrain. This would leave irregular ledges, <br />shelves, and plenty of pockets suitable for placement of additional topsoil and vegetation or for <br />use as erosion control drainages. The topsoil or fill would be adjusted to obtain a varying <br />contoured slope, and the top and toe of fill would be rounded to blend with surrounding <br />19 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.