My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1990-10-03_REPORT - C1980005
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Report
>
Coal
>
C1980005
>
1990-10-03_REPORT - C1980005
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/14/2021 2:45:13 PM
Creation date
11/27/2007 7:03:15 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980005
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
10/3/1990
Doc Name
REVEGETATION MONITORING REPORT
Annual Report Year
1989
Permit Index Doc Type
REVEG MONITORING REPORT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br /> Reference Area Sampling <br /> The Seneca II Mine Mountain Brush and Sagebrush reference areas were sampled to provide data <br /> for comparison with reclaimed area data. Methods used were the same as detailed above for the <br /> reclaimed areas except shrub density was determined within 1 m x 50m quadrats. <br /> Photooraohic Record <br /> Within each reclamation area, representative color photographs were taken to document the <br /> appearance of the vegetation in 1989. Within each photo, a placard identifies the particular <br /> reclamation area being illustrated. Photo locations are shown on the sample location map (Map <br /> 1). <br /> • Statistical Methods <br /> Sample adequacy calculations were carried out using the formula as prescribed by CMLRB <br /> (1988): <br /> t2 s2 <br /> Nmin = <br /> d2 x2 <br /> where: <br /> t = 1.645 (two-tailed t-value with infinite degrees of freedom) <br /> s2 = sample variance (based sn-1) <br /> d = 0.1 (level of precision or desired detectable reduction) <br /> x = sample mean <br /> Confidence limits for comparisons to reference areas were calculated using the formula for <br /> Post-mining Comparisons on page 17 of CMLRB (1988), using an estimated t-value of 1.65. <br /> Confidence limits for areas not being compared to a reference area (ie. shrub density), were <br /> • 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.