My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1990-10-03_REPORT - C1980005
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Report
>
Coal
>
C1980005
>
1990-10-03_REPORT - C1980005
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/14/2021 2:45:13 PM
Creation date
11/27/2007 7:03:15 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980005
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
10/3/1990
Doc Name
REVEGETATION MONITORING REPORT
Annual Report Year
1989
Permit Index Doc Type
REVEG MONITORING REPORT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• reclaimed area. Additional shrub density plots were located randomly as previously discussed. <br /> In the two reference areas, equal numbers of cover and shrub density samples (15) were taken <br /> in each. All shrubs, including seedlings, with root crowns found within the quadrat boundaries <br /> were tabulated by species and by life stages as follows: seedling, mature, or dead. <br /> Plant Species Frequency and Density Measurements <br /> During the course of cover and shrub density sampling, all plant species occurring within the <br /> shrub density quadrats were noted as a part of each sample. Frequency for each plant species <br /> observed during sampling was calculated by dividing the number of sample transecis in which <br /> the species was observed by the total number of samples (20 in reclaimed areas, 15 in <br /> reference areas). As such, this value is more probably correctly known as "constancy." <br /> Relative vegetation cover was calculated by dividing the absoulute cover of each species by the <br /> total vegetation cover and expressing the result as a percent. <br /> The total number of species (within each lifeform) observed in each sample provide a measure <br /> • of"species density", indicating relative species richness of different areas. These measures <br /> provide an indication of progress toward return of diverse species composition to the reclaimed <br /> areas from a different perspective than is available from examination of cover data alone. <br /> Plant Species Ltstina <br /> During the course of the field work, a list of all encountered plant species (quantitatively plus <br /> incidental observations) was compiled for each reclamation area and the two reference areas. <br /> Scientific names used follow Weber and Johnston (1979); common names cited may be found in <br /> Beetle (1970), Nickerson et al. (1976), or SCS (1979). Cross reference to the substantially <br /> revised scientific nomenclature for the flora of Western Colorado, as set forth by Weber <br /> (1987), may be determined by reference to Wittman et al. (1988). Of plant species observed, <br /> only Canada thistle ( irsi um ary -ns ), Dalmation toadflax (Linnria delmati .a), and common <br /> bindweed (Convolvuls arvensis) are listed state-wide as noxious weeds (Thornton et al. 1974). <br /> Blue lettuce (Lactuca pulchella), buckhorn plantain (Plantago lanceolata), curly dock ($fix <br /> • crispus), and pennycress (Thlaspi arvense), all restricted noxious weeds in Colorado (Thornton <br /> et al. 1974) are also sparingly present at some locations in the reclaimed areas. <br /> 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.