Laserfiche WebLink
Christine Johnston <br />Mountain Coal Company <br />Page 3 <br />January 13,1998 <br />14. A response is provided below for each of the paragraphs addressed in the Division's <br />review letter dated November 12, 1997 and in MCC's response dated December 1 I, <br />1997. <br />• No further response is required at this time. <br />• No further response is required at this time. <br />• No further response is required at this time. <br />• Alternate methods of measuring flow are available and should have been <br />employed if the flume capacity was exceeded. No further response is <br />required at this time. <br />• MCC did not provide a response to this item. <br />• Required analytical parameters were not collected and reported. No <br />further response is required at this time. <br />• No further response is required at this time. <br />15. A response is provided below for each of the paragraphs addressed in the Division's <br />review letter dated November 12, 1997 and in MCC's response dated December 11, <br />1997. <br />No further response is required at this time. <br />Several required analytical parameters for the baseline monitoring <br />program are missing from Appendix F for Springs 26-1, 27-1, and l5-l. <br />Also, please note that the baseline monitoring schedule requires that <br />samples be collected for chemical analysis in April (weather permitting), <br />June and September. No further response is required at this time. <br />Some of the required analytical parameters were not collected and/or <br />reported. No further response is required at this time. <br />