REP33542 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

The Trapper reclaimed rangelands cover success standazd is based on "allowable wver." For Range Site A, • which includes Rangeland Reclamation Block AD&H-AB, the "allowable cover" standard is 52 % with at least 33 % of the cover coming from herbaceous vegetation. For Range Site C, which includes Rangeland Reclamation Block AC&D-C, the "allowable cover" standan3 is 47 % with at least 25 % of the cover coming from herbaceous vegetation. The "allowable cover" standard at Trapper includes perennial plant cover (minus the cover from noxious perennial weeds), and up to l0% relative annual plant cover, and litter cover up to the max;mum allowed per Range Site (Range Site A =19%; Range Site C = 22%). The Cropland Reclamation Block has no cover success standard Productiou. For the two Rangeland Reclamaton Blocks and the Cropland Reclamation Block, sampled using the simple random statistical sampling approach, all of the production transect locations were randomly located within the appropriate reclamation block and along each tiansecst a total of three randomly located one half square meter clip plots were clipped. The three plots were clipped by life fom>s for perennial grasses and perennial forts. As recommended in the Division's Cnzidelines, annuals and biennials and shrub production was not clipped The three clip plots were then averaged into a single transect datum for purposes of statistical analysis. For each reclamation block sampled a minimum of 30 production transecxs were used for sample adequacy calculations. Following clipping the clipped materials were dried in a drying oven in the Trapper Mine Coal Laboratory at 30 degrees C for a period of 48 hours. The revegetation production success standards are the Reference Area value for the Cropland Reclamation Block and 62.39 grams per square meter (g/m2) for the Range Site A (Rangeland Reclamation Block AD&H- AB) and 47.46 grams per square meter (g/mz)for Range Site C (Rangeland Reclamation Block AC&D-C). • Shrub Density. Starting at each of the 30 transect locations described above for the production sampling of Rangeland Reclamation Block AD&H-A/B, the fifty-meter tape was laid out along a predetermined and randomly selected alignment Woody stem density was detemvned using the center of the tape as a modified belt transect. The right-hand side of the trarrsect was called Side A and the left-hand side of the tape was called Side B. Data collected from each side were added into a trarrsect value which represents the number of shrub stems sampled in the 100 square meter sample plot These data are reported in the Results Section as to the number of shrubs per 100 square meters as well as the number of shrubs per acre as outlined in the Pemut In addition, shrub survivaVdensity counts were taken on three Shrub Clumps, conshucted within Rangeland Block AD&H-AB-93-95 using a fiunterrd loader. On these sites, which contain an average of approximately 250 component pads per clump, at least half of these pads were counted to quantify that at least 50 percent of these pads, contained at least 10 living woody plant stems per pad The revegetation woody plant density success standard is 400 stems per acre for Rangeland Reclamation Block AD&H-AB. Rangeland Reclamation Block AC&D-C and the Cropland Reclamation Block have no woody plant density success standards. Species Diversity. The plant cover data collected along each sample ttar>.sect yielded data relative to absolute and relative cover as detemvned by the perrzntage of hits. These cover data were then converted into percent composition or relative plant cover by species based upon the total amount of plant cover encountered in each sample trarlsec;t. The relative importance values of plants growing on the reclaimed areas as outlined in the Pemrit, contain standards as to the number of perennial grass species growing on the reclaimed areas to ensure that a monoculture of a single plant or a few plants does not f~J