My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP32998
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP32998
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 12:09:15 AM
Creation date
11/27/2007 6:23:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977211
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
5/27/1985
Doc Name
112 ENCLOSURE-PIKEVIEW QUARRY
Permit Index Doc Type
ANNUAL FEE / REPORT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
OLD STOCKPILE AREA: A detailed assessment of this area has not been <br />completed, but watching the growth over the first growing season clearly <br />indicated that the success rate was highly variable and would require <br />supplemental spot seeding to fill in the weak areas. Such seeding was <br />done and it appears that the spot seeding will probably correct the <br />growth deficiencies in the weak areas. <br />The Cottonwood and the Russian Olive trees seemed to have survived <br />the winter, but it is still too early to make an assessment of their <br />success. <br />It is planned that in early summer of 1985 this area will be <br />intensively sampled in order to establish a quantitative baseline <br />regarding the frequency, density, and cover of the vegetation. This <br />will aid in monitoring the growth and the development of the vegetation. <br />TRACT WDT: This showed highly similar success characteristics as the <br />Old Stockpile Area just described. In some places, the growth was quite <br />thick, while other areas showed very sparse growth. This may have been <br />due to uneven seed distribution or to local environmental differences. <br />The area was spot seeded this year and the rate of seed distribution was <br />intentionally kept as uniform as possible. If the weaknesses still are <br />present then it must be environmental and the cause would need to be <br />identified. <br />This area too will be intensively sampled this summer in order to <br />establish a quantitative baseline. <br />ABANDONED ROAD: This area received a supplemental seeding in 1984. <br />It appears to have taken quite well although minor rilling and shallow <br />gullying is appearing on the outslope. This does not appear to be <br />serious, but will be watched. The vegetation appears to be quite <br />strong on this area. <br />ORIGINAL ACCESS ROAD: Growth on this small area was patchy <br />As it turns out, the seed that was used on this area was quite <br />old and had not been discarded. In light of that it is truly <br />amazing anything came up. The area was spot seeded this year <br />the growth - fresh seed was used this time. <br />All other areas are too young to assess. <br />and weak. <br />to enhance <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.