My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP32998
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP32998
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 12:09:15 AM
Creation date
11/27/2007 6:23:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977211
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
5/27/1985
Doc Name
112 ENCLOSURE-PIKEVIEW QUARRY
Permit Index Doc Type
ANNUAL FEE / REPORT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />TOPSOIL STOCKPILES: <br /> <br />DATE OF SEEDING: APRIL 19, 1985 ([JAITED FOR GRADING TO BE DONE) <br />SPECIES RATE (LBS/ACRE) <br />CRESTED WHEATGRASS, FAIRWAY 2.5 <br />INTERMEDIATE WHEATGRASS 3.0 <br />PUBESCENT WHEATGRASS 3.0 <br />YELLOW S[JEETCLOVER 1.0 <br />SEEDING OF ROADSIDES ABOVE OFFICE: (INCLUDING MTN. SHADOWS ROAD) <br />DATE OF SEEDING: MARCH 21, 1985 <br />~pEr1F.~ <br />LITTLE BLUESTEM <br />SIDEOATS GRAMA <br />WESTERN WHEATGRASS <br />INTERMEDIATE WHEATGRASS <br />PUBESCENT WHEATGRASS <br />STREAMBANK WHEATGRASS <br />YELLOW SWEETCLOVER <br />RATE (LBS/ACRE) <br />3 <br />3 <br />3 <br />3 <br />2.5 <br />2.5 <br />1.5 <br />RULE 2.41(5): THE TYPE AND APPROXIMATE QUANTITY OF FERTILIZERS, ORGANIC <br />MATERIAL, OR SOIL CONDITIONERS USED AND LOCATION OF USE. <br />No fertilization of these areas were done at this time. First, <br />most areas that were spot seeded very likely did not need fertilization. <br />Second, we are attempting to assess the differences on certain materials <br />between the application of fertilizer and seeding without fertilization. <br />We feel there is very likely a difference, but are attempting to <br />determine whether or not the benefits are worth the expense of <br />application. It may be that in the long run (after several years) the <br />differences are minor. <br />RULE 2.41(6): AN APPRAISAL OF THE SUCCESS OF RECLAMATION EFFORTS, AND <br />IN THE EVENT OF FAILURE OF ANY EFFORTS, A SHORT NARRATIVE ON THE <br />SUSPECTED OR DETERMINED CAUSE OF SUCH FAILURE. <br />Responses to this item are broken into several sections which deal <br />with each area in particular. <br />ACCESS ROAD: The growth on the cut slopes of the access road is truly <br />remarkable. In fact, several parties in the Colorado Springs area have <br />inquired as to how it was done. Although some minor rill erosion has <br />shown itself on the slopes, it does not appear to be getting much worse. <br />In places the grass and legume is so dense that it forms nearly a lawn. <br />In other places, especially where the soil is more gravelly, it is not <br />so dense, but still strong enough to provide some protection. <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.