Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Boulay <br />1993/94 AHR Responses <br />Page 6 <br />lasting a few days.) Page 13 has been revised to include this information. MCC has contracted <br />with Wright-Wazer Engineers to assist MCC in updating the Probable Hydrologic <br />Consequence permit discussion to include the large inflows seen during WY 1996, and will <br />submit this in the form a revision application in the next few months. <br />14. Please find a revised Page 15 enclosed thaz corrects Exfubit 3 to read Figure 3. <br />I5. Mme inflows were a component of the wazer collected in Pond MB-1, although a minor part <br />due to the typically small or "weepy" nature and short duration of past inflows. MCC does not <br />believe thaz sampling and analyzing individual inflows provides any useful data as the true <br />"impact" of mine water inflow quality is monitored by determining the quality of any flows <br />containing such inflows that are to be discharged from the mine site (i.e., Pond MB-1). <br />16. Please fled a revised page 17 enclosed. Table D-2, Appendix D has been revised to read Table <br />J-1, Appendix J. <br />17. Please find revised pages 1 and 2 of 8 of Table F-1 that corrects the Baseline Max and Mm <br />titles. <br />18. Please find a revised Table H-1 enclosed, data for SG-1 and GP-1 has been corrected. <br />19. The footnote on Table H-1 indicates that laboratory analyses were accomplished by ACZ, Inc. <br />Please find a revised page 26 that indicates thaz Lrboratory Analysis Reports are on file az the <br />West Elk Mme. <br />20. Sampling protowl is prescribed in the permit on page 205-78, which ensures consistency. <br />21. As suggested, the quality of groundwater from the B Seam will be compared to baseline <br />values. Consistent use of both total and dissolved metals analyses for Fe and Mn for future <br />sampling efforts is prescribed (see footnote 3, Table 1.4-1, of the 1995 AHR) <br />22. Values in Table E-1 have been corrected (copy enclosed), and Page 22 has been revised. The <br />manganese baseline maximum of 0.500 for the lower station is suspect fora 0.075 maximum az <br />the upper station, and will be reviewed. <br />23. MCC will attempt to include observations about each of the sediment ponds in the AHR <br />In addition to the above changes, please find a revised page 20 regarding the drop in wazer levels in <br />well SOM-2-H (1994 AHR), as there was and is no basis for stating an influence from mining <br />occurred. The slopes are unstable in the vicinity of the well. A revised hydrograph for well JMB-12 <br />(1994 AHR) is also enclosed. <br />