My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP31877
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP31877
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 12:08:08 AM
Creation date
11/27/2007 6:03:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980001
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
5/25/1984
Doc Name
REVIEW OF EDNA MINES 1983 HYDROLOGIC MONITORING REPORT AND PREDICTES HYDROLOGIC IMPACT FOR THE MIDTE
From
MLRD
To
GREGG SQUIRE
Permit Index Doc Type
HYDROLOGY REPORT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />-5- <br />All wells exhibited high TSS levels and total iron levels. This is probably a <br />result of well installation. TSS levels in properly installed and flushed <br />wells should be very low. The total iron levels are a result of suspended <br />iron solids as part of the TSS levels. <br />B. Oak Creek <br />Baseline quality of the alluvial aquifer of Oak Creek was similar to that of <br />the surface water. There were two wells completed for the baseline study <br />however only the downstream well is monitored as part of the ongoing program. <br />The upstream well exhibited water of a calcium bicarbonate type, while the <br />downstream well was calcium sulfate. TDS levels, as well as sodium, calcium, <br />magnesium and sulfate, were higher in the downstream well. <br />Since no disturbance was planned for this drainage, continued monitoring of <br />the downstream well has consisted of field parameters only since 1982. As one <br />might expect, there has been little change. <br />III. Other <br />P&M also monitored bedrock wells and springs as part of their baseline study. <br />These are not part of the ongoing program. <br />The springs that were studied were several of many springs which emanate from <br />existing ungraded spoils. These springs flow directly into Trout Creek and <br />are comparable in water quality to alluvial water sites TR2 and TR3. <br />P8d~1 committed to installation of a spoils well in year 4 of mining (1984) in <br />the West Ridge Area. On May 15, 1984 the reclaimed section referred to as the <br />South of Shop Area slid down the hillside. Studies and predictions as to why <br />this happened and its relatiionship to the stability of other mined areas may <br />necessitate additional spoils water monitoring. This is discussed further <br />under Corronents/Recommendations. <br />The bedrock wells reported as part of the baseline study were installed not <br />only as part of the baseline study but also as part of two studies to predict <br />mine inflows from intercepted aquifers. <br />In the West Ridge Area the zero potential line (confined vs unconfined ground <br />water conditions) was found to be between elevation 7,224 and 7,300. Wells <br />drilled close to the bottom of the slope flowed at the surface. <br />In the Moffat Area the zero potential line was found to be between elevation <br />7,050 and 7,100. Several wells installed below the zero potential line in <br />this area may have flowed at the surface, the data is not clear. <br />Pump tests were performed in both areas and data indicated that the wells have <br />very low productivity and aquifers can be dewatered rapidly. From this data <br />it is concluded that in the strata affected by mining there are no indications <br />of a good aquifer zone. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.