Laserfiche WebLink
n <br />~~ <br />-4- <br />II. Alluvial Wells <br />A. Trout Creek <br /> <br />P&M established four alluvial wells on Trout Creek. The four wells exhibited <br />marked differences in water quality indicative of their locations. Some water <br />quality parameters have undergone changes since baseline. <br />TR1 is an upstream alluvial well established adjacent to the West Ridge Area. <br />It is also adjacent to an abandoned underground mine. Water is of a <br />calcium-magnesium sulfate type. TDS levels during baseline averaged 1,414 <br />mg/1 (maximum of 1,797 mg/1). Water in this alluvial well has increased in <br />levels of sulfate, phosphorus and iron (total and dissolved) in 1983. TDS <br />levels also appear to show a marked increase in 1983. This would indicate <br />that mining in the West Ridge Area has had an effect on these alluvial waters. <br />TR2 is located on the west side of Trout Creek across from unreclaimed <br />spoils. The water in this well is also of acalcium-magnesium sulfate type <br />with somewhat decreased levels of magnesium relative to calcium. TDS levels <br />averaged 1982 mg/1 during baseline (2,249 mg/1 maximum). Since baseline there <br />has been a significant increase in iron (total and dissolved), phosphorus and <br />calcium. TDS levels have also increased but not as significantly as levels in <br />TR1. The levels in this well have been increasing since baseline. <br />TR1.5 was established between TR1 and TR2 in 1982. The Division does not have <br />installation data or a location for this well. In general, water quality in <br />this well resembles the quality of water in Trout Creek. Water is of the <br />calcium-sulfate type and appears to show a decrease in 1983 in chemical <br />parameter levels. Iron levels are very high but other levels are comparable <br />to Trout Creek. <br />P&M does not offer any explanation as to why the quality of alluvial water is <br />better in TR1.5 relative to TR1 and TR2. Without location or installation <br />data, I would guess that TR1.5 is in direct communication with the surface <br />water system while TR1 and TR2 are not. <br />TR3 is located adjacent to the Moffat Area. Water in this well is primarily <br />calcium-sulfate type with slightly lower levels of iron and bicarbonate. <br />Other water quality parameters have shown decreased levels except phosphorus <br />which has shown an increase. <br />TR4 was located downstream of the permit boundary for the baseline study. <br />Since baseline this well has been relocated upstream but P8d~9 has not submitted <br />new well completion data or an updated location map. Water in this well is <br />primarily calcium sulfate. All water quality parameter levels have decreased <br />since baseline. <br />Data collected from the alluvial wells indicate that TR1.5, TR3 and TR4 <br />maintain a good connection with Trout Creek while TR1 and TR2 do not. This is <br />contradicted in the permit application where it is stated that TRl is <br />installed in an area which receives subsurface flow from Little Trout Creek as <br />it enters Trout Creek and that should indicate a good interconnection. <br />