My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP31139
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP31139
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 12:07:10 AM
Creation date
11/27/2007 5:49:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1988112
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
9/22/1995
Doc Name
BATTLE MOUNTAIN RESOURCES INC SAN LUIS PROJECT PN M-88-112 TR-006 AND TR-023 WEEKLY POND COMPLIANCE
From
BATTLE MOUNTAIN RESOURCES INC
To
DMG
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
J. Dillie <br />September 20, 1995 <br />Page 2 <br />when the instantatteous daily or weekly pond values were higher than the permitted values <br />as a result of operator error and during times of high copper ore. 1 here circumstances <br />were known in advance of taking a post detox sample. The following procedures have <br />consistently been in place to analyze the operation of the 1[~ICO system and provide <br />expedient recognition of arty problems in the system. Satnples are taken every two hours <br />of the post detox and analyzed with the picric acid method. This is a much quiclrer and <br />more efficient way of determining whether there are problems with the cyanide destruction <br />system: Thus, BMRI is convinced that sampling of the post detox as required try TR-010 <br />has no value in assessing current or potential compliance. <br />These latest post detox sample results continue to highlight the confusion on the sampling <br />required by TR-006, TR-010, and TR-023 as discussed in our August 24, 1995 letter. <br />Samples sent off-site for analysis have different reporting times than samples analyzed on- <br />site. In this case, the off-site sample indicated a potential problem that was not present at <br />any other time or place on site and not an indicator of a potential problem with the INCO <br />system or tailings pond compliance. [n addition, it would seem that the samples sent off- <br />site as part of [he bi-weekly samples should not be included in [he monthly average <br />requirements for TR-010. We await the Division's response to our August 24, 1995 letter <br />and request for additional clarification on the monitoring and reporting requirements. In <br />[he interim, we will be analyzing the post detox bi-weekly samples both on and off site. <br />Please do not hesitate to contact the to arrange for the meeting, to discuss this issue, or to <br />answer any questions. BMRI would prefer that the meeting be scheduled on October 2 or <br />October 3, 1995. <br />Sincerely, <br />i <br />Sally ayes <br />Enclosures <br />cc: Anne Baldrige <br />Dan Robertson <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.