My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP30270
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP30270
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 12:00:43 AM
Creation date
11/27/2007 5:34:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981013
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
6/8/2006
Doc Name
2005 AHR Review Letter
From
DMG
To
Peak Project Management
Annual Report Year
2005
Permit Index Doc Type
Hydrology Report
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ron Thompson <br />Page 2 <br />06/09/06 <br />Bedrock well water quality sampling is no longer required due to the large distances of these <br />wells from the mined area. <br />Flooding of the workings continued through 2005, with the two measured GEM wells returning <br />an average water level elevation of 6815 feet AMSL at the end of 2005. Water levels rose 10 <br />feet in the GEM-1 monitoring location south of Highway 12 as of the end of 2005. Due to the <br />sealing of the NW-1 shaft (GEM-3) in December 2004, water level can no longer be measured at <br />GEM-3. <br />Alluvial water quality along the Purgatoire River is within an acceptable range for all known and <br />current uses. PAW-5 and PAW-6 water quality samples show no significant changes from <br />previous samples taken. A sample taken in April 2006 in alluvial well CCAW-1 below the <br />development waste pile may shows a general improvement of water quality. All alluvial water <br />wells were within normal and expected ranges. <br />Sarins~ and Seea Survey <br />All spring and seep monitoring has been discontinued. <br />Summary <br />Surface water is no longer monitored at this site. Ground water quantity impacts are unlikely but <br />possible. This year is the tenth year after reseeding of the mine site. Ground water quality <br />impacts are not apparent and water quality data collected from water in the mine workings <br />indicate impacts to ground water quality are minor, as mine water appears to be of similar quality <br />as the baseline ground water quality. <br />This concludes the Divisions review of the 2005 Annual Hydrology Report for the Golden Eagle <br />mine. Thank you for your diligence in completing your monitoring program in accordance with <br />the approved plan. <br />Sincer ly, <br />K Gorham <br />Environmental Protection Specialist II <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.