Laserfiche WebLink
• Mr. Joseph Dudash - 3 - April 25, 2001 <br />AHR. If BRL agrees with this assessment, please offer an explanation for these treads. If <br />BRL does not agree with the Division's assessment, please explain why. <br />Pond 10-1 has one conductivity reading during the fall of 1997 that influences this <br />upward trend. 1~he operator believes this reading is anomalous, but will over time be <br />countered with continued moderate readings. Pond 10-5 has two high values for <br />conductivity during the first quarter of 1995. Again, the operator feels these readings are <br />anomalous and will be countered with the current moderate readings. Pond 10-12 does <br />seem [o be trending upward rather steeply, the flows encountered during recent readings <br />are very low, and could be representative of stagnant water. The operator will pay <br />particulaz attention to all of these ponds during the 2001 sampling season to assure that <br />no stagnant water is sampled. <br />8. The Divisia7's review of the l+istoric conductivity levels in wells SbI-09 and Sh1-I0, <br />shown on monitoring point chart pages 34 and 35 respectively, appear to show fairly <br />significant increases in conductivity over time. If BRL agrees, please explain [he possible <br />cause. IjBRL does not agree with the Division's assessment, please explain rovhv. <br />The conductivity trend lines indicated on these charts do show an increase in conductivity <br />over time. However, recent conductivity readings are lower than those recorded during <br />1988. BRL has no explananation for the increasing trend line, except that the higher <br />conductivity readings have retrained for a longer duration than during the previously <br />recorded low readings. <br />The table of contents jor the section o+t "monitoring point tables" is riot the correct table <br />of contents. The table of contents in that section is for the "monitoring point chart." <br />Please provide tl:e correct table of contents so that t{:e page can 6e replaced. <br />The correct table of contents now appears before the monitoring point tables. <br />10. The stole ojthe flow axis for the chart on SW-10, foemd on page 3 of the monitoring <br />point chmz section is too large. It makes it almost impossible [o .ree the historn of flow for <br />that location. Please modify this chart fa~ t)te nest AHR. <br />The chart has been corrected. <br />1999 Nline Inflow Report <br />No response required. <br />1999 Subsidence Report <br />The Division has several comments concerning the subsidence information. <br />