My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP29481
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP29481
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:59:56 PM
Creation date
11/27/2007 5:20:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982056
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
3/1/2002
Doc Name
2000 AHR Responses to DMG Letter dated 3/15/01
From
Twentymile Coal Company
To
DMG
Annual Report Year
2000
Permit Index Doc Type
Hydrology Report
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Tom Kaldenbach <br />February 21, 2002 <br />Page Two <br />5. On Table 65C, the November values for average flow rate and cfs are in error. The <br />average flow rate value is actually 8.4 gpm, which equates to 0.019 cfs. Two (2) copies <br />of the revised Table are attached to substitute with the ones in your copies of the Foide] <br />Creek 2000 AHR. <br />6. Future AHRs will include flow information used to estimate upstream flows during <br />periods of limited access. <br />7. Site 109 is to be monitored for water level and field parameters quarterly and sampled for <br />water quality quarterly, if discharging. Two (2) copies of the revised text are attached to <br />substitute with the ones in your copies of the Foidel Creek 2000 AHR. <br />8. The underground gate road leading to 6 Right is scheduled to be sealed within the next <br />two months, thus, there will be no access to 6 Right for measuring inflow. However, <br />inflows in the 6 Right area will migrate downgradient to the northeast, and will be <br />reflected in the future inflow data of 10 Right. <br />9. What changes in mine discharge procedure does TCC propose to ensure that Fish Creek <br />does not exceed the suspect level of 1500 umhos/cm below mining operations ? In order <br />to quantify the predicted effect of sulfate contributions from sites 115 and 109, TCC in <br />association with a consultant, has developed a computer program -the "FCBH <br />Calculator". In the winter, when stream gauging is difficult, the FCBH Calculator uses <br />the flow and conductivity values from sites 69 (Trout Creek above Fish Creek <br />confluence) and 1005 (Trout Creek below Fish Creek confluence) to estimate the <br />appropriate discharge for sites 115 and/or 109. These same sites are also used to estimate <br />appropriate flow for site 109 in the summer. In the summer, the FCBH Calculator uses <br />measured flow and conductivity values from site 16A (upstream of discharge site 155), <br />and conductivity values from site 115 to calculate how much mine water, if any, may be <br />discharged from site 115. TCC uses these methods to manage controllable discharge <br />from sites 115 and 109, and avoid contributing to sulfate exceedences in Trout Creek. <br />10. An elevated concentration of total recoverable mercury was detected from a July 20, <br />2000 water sample obtained at Site 1005. DMG requests any data indicating <br />concentrations of mercury from the WMD sump area. <br />TCC examined mercury analytical data from additional sampling episodes for Site 1005 <br />collected in 2000 and to date for 2001. In all cases mercury was reported to be below <br />detection limits (< 0.2 ugly. TCC also had the analytical laboratory reexamine there data <br />for this sampling, but found no discrepancies. TCC has no explanation for this anomaly. <br />TCC will continue to monitor this site as outlined in the subject permit. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.