My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP29179
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP29179
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:59:41 PM
Creation date
11/27/2007 5:15:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1988112
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
7/1/1991
Doc Name
SAN LUIS PROJECT TAILINGS IMPOUNDMENT CONSTRUCTION REPORT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 <br />1 <br /> <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br /> <br />1 <br />1 <br />LJ <br />t <br />1 <br />1 <br />4-in corrugated, perforated HDPE pipe with a filter fabric sock was installed in the invert of the <br />drain, During the fmal grading operations the drill casing was regrouted and sealed. <br />2.4 Lower Impoundment Foundation <br />The lower impoundment foundation excavation can be divided into three separate zones. These <br />zones would consist of the upper north abutment, the alluvial deposits in the lower reaches and the <br />south abutment. <br />The upper north abutment consisted of the Sante Fe gravel formation, i.e., very dense angular sands <br />and gravels with some cementation. This formation was generally encountered from approximately <br />the 8,540-ft bench upwazd. The contractor experienced some difficulty excavating t9»s material due <br />to the light cementation and high density. Much of this area had to be ripped before it could be <br />borrowed. This material was used for Type 1 material (not next to the liner) in the main <br />embankment fill and as Type 4 material in the main embattlortent and sputter embankment. <br />Early in the project it was observed that it would be extremely difficult to perform the earthworks <br />for the phase 3 expansion between the main embanlmtent and sputter embankment at a later date, <br />due to the steepness of the natural terrain. Some of the natural slopes in this area were standing <br />steeper than 2:1. A decision was made by BMG to redesign the slopes in this area too <br />accommodate the phase 3 earthwork construction in conjtmction with the phase 1 work. BMG <br />signed a change order for this work with TT'IR the earthworks contractor. The slopes were <br />redesigned so that the slopes below the 8,590-ft elevation were 5:1 or less, and the slopes between <br />the 8,590-ft elevation and the 8,620-ft elevation were 3:1. The design change called for placing <br />approximately 50,000 CY of structural fill material in the four major drainages along the north slope <br />of the lower impoundment. In total, the redesigned slopes generated approximately 140,000 CY <br />of material, leaving an excess of approximately 90,000 CY which was placed in the main <br />embattlrntent. <br />The south abutment slopes had shallow deposits of silts located on the east side of the ridges. <br />These silts were used for liner foundation material (T~rpe 3) and were borrowed and placed directly <br />on the fill At deeper depths the material appeared to be part of the Sante Fe formation with a <br />higher silt content than encountered on the north abutment. The majority of the material borrowed <br />from the south slopes was placed in the random fill (Type 4) of the main embartlottent, due to the <br />higher content of silt. <br />The original design called for skirting azound the large knob located on the south abutment slope. <br />However, after analyzing the borrow layout for the entire impoundment it was determined that the <br />7 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.