My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP29099
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP29099
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:59:36 PM
Creation date
11/27/2007 5:13:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982057
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
2/28/1992
Doc Name
1991 ANNUAL HYDROLOGY REPORT TEXT
Annual Report Year
1991
Permit Index Doc Type
HYDROLOGY REPORT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
runoff which recharges the aquifer. Often, bedrock (i.e., non alluvial) aquifers exhibit • <br />a lag time between spring runoff and highest water Levels. (later levels then decrease <br />(deepen) as late summer or fall approaches. Two cells (150V and 180V ), however, exhibited <br />unusually high water levels in September, although most water levels dropped again in <br />October. Two cells (16V and 3wC) exhibited unusually high water levels this year, white <br />two other wells (3W and 13w) exhibited water levels that continued to drop. <br />Annual water Level maximum and minimum values have, in general for wells drilled prior to <br />1987, been on the decrease (i.e., deepening) since 1986. This is probably due to the <br />lower than normal snowpacks in the vicinity during the last five years. An exception to <br />this would be the water levels at alluvial wells bA1 to bA3 which have shown higher water <br />levels due to recently introduced irrigation in that area. <br />Water Oualitv. Table 3 (Appendix A), Summary of Ground (later Monitoring 4ells, describes <br />Che wells that are sampled and at what frequency they are sampled. In 1991, samples were <br />collected from twelve wells. In addition, two wells from which water samples are required <br />were either dry or had not enough water to sample. <br />Table 4 (Appendix A) shows the ground water parameter list used for all wells. Analyses • <br />have been performed by AC2 Laboratory in Steamboat Springs, Colorado since May 31, 1983. <br />AC2 Laboratory is EPA certified and performs all analyses by EPA or equivalent methods. <br />Samples are delivered the day of collection to [he lab in an iced cooler. The following <br />discussion of the analytical data collected during [he reporting period is arranged by <br />strata being monitored and coincides with the format (by aquifer type) in which the <br />analytical data are presented in Appendix D. Sampling techniques for each well are given <br />in the remarks page in the same appendix. <br />Tables 5 to 7 (Appendix A) tabulate the percentage of mi lliequivalents per liter of major <br />ions and total dissolved solids (7D5) for each well sampled. All data prior to 1990 has <br />been averaged together to provide the baseline (i.e., premining) conditions that existed. <br />In addition, the range of total dissolved solids (TDS) that existed prior to mining is <br />also given. Since mining began in 1990, data from that point on is listed separately. <br />The following discussion of water quality ui ll limit itself to a description of major <br />ions. A separate section, Comparison of Ground Water Quality to Ua[er Use Standards, will <br />list [hose samples that exceed water use standards. <br />• <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.