Laserfiche WebLink
SM6S-02 <br />• Hater Year October July August September <br />1985 0.81 0.65 1.00 0.48 <br />1986 0.74 1.02 0.46. 0.53 <br />1987 0.74 1.02 0.57 0.48 <br />1988 0.53 0.44 0.32 0.39 <br />SWGS-03 <br />Water Year October July August September <br />1985 1.15 - - 0,2g <br />1986 - 2.65 0.58 - <br />1987 - 0.75 0.34 0.20 <br />1988 0.40 0.92 0.31 0.37 <br />- Indicates months when insufficient data was available. <br />As usual, correlation between the combined upstream flows and the downstream <br />flows is not consistent. Palisade Water's diversions above the upper <br />recorders and the excess water dumping point above Lhe lower recorder could <br />make accurate correlation impossible. The Creek flows showed a lower than <br />normal rate for the year similar to what the Colorado River showed. <br />There was no discharge from sediment control ponds during the 1988 water <br />year; therefore, there was no discharge through CDPS No. CO-0027146 discharge <br />points 005 - 014. Flows in the Roadside Mine continued to be diverted <br />to the abandoned portions of the mine; therefore, there was no mine discharge <br />• to the surface from CDPS discharge points 001 or 002. Abandoned portions <br />of the Cameo Mine that were being flooded during the 1987 water year filled <br />in November 1987 and discharge through CDPS discharge point 004 began on <br />November 30. Data pages SF-2 and SF-3 are tabulations of weekly monitoring <br />done on discharge point 004 during the year. There were no violation of <br />discharge permit limits for this point during the year. The following <br />is the average water quality for the year: <br />Point pH TDS TSS TFe <br />004 8.55 1627 Mg/L 16.7 Mg/L 0.24 Mg/L <br />Table 588-9 contains mine discharge information related to the 1988 water <br />year, Further information on the mine water is given in the MINE HATER <br />section of this report. <br />GROUND WATER <br />Piezometers along Rapid Creek and Cottonwood Creek are now-being monitored <br />for water level in May and September corresponding to high and low flows <br />in the creeks. Data page GA-1 contains the results of this monitoring. <br />The following table-compares this years readings with the average of previous <br />readings near the same time: <br />~ J <br />-2- <br />