My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP27867
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP27867
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:58:40 PM
Creation date
11/27/2007 4:53:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977378
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
4/28/1976
Doc Name
GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION TAILINGS POND 3 STANDARD METALS SILVERTON MILL
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 <br /> • • <br /> We have also investigated the risks of potential instability of the embankment <br /> from seismic problems. Information from the Nati onal Earthqu ake Center <br />' indicates that the latest earthquake in the Four Corners Area was c~picentered <br /> at North Latitude 37° and West Longitude 107°, on January 22, 1966. This quake <br /> <br /> had an intensity of 7.0 o n the Mercalli scale and was felt in the Ourango- <br />' Silverton Area. Modern practice in tailings disposal has shown that sand <br />tailings placed at over 60% relative density are not severely subject to sand <br />' liquifaction upon vibration. The data gathered during the field ami laboratory <br />work indicates relative densities of the sand tailings of 67% to over 100% <br />were encountered. It is our opinion that sand tailings have sufficient density <br />' against a potential liquifaction problem. However, "circular" failures might <br />possibly result because of vibration. It must be noted that the earthquake <br />potential of the site is considered to be low and circular failures from these <br />' conditions are not likely. However, the possibility of vibration should be <br />incorporated into design for long term use of Pond 3. <br />' Based on the above analysis, it is our opinion that increasing the height <br />of the pond more than an additional 6 feet would reduce the factor oi' safety <br />' beyond acceptable limits. <br />If it is desired to continue use of the pond additional stability <br />should be added to the existing embankment. This can be accomplished by one of <br />' the three following methods. <br />1. The existing embankment can be stabilized by placing sand tailings at <br />the front of the earthen berm. Placement of sand tailings without compaction <br />' should be approximately 2.5 to 1, (i.e, horizontal to vertical). This will <br />increase the safety factor for use of the pond to the additional 6 foot crest <br />height above 1.5. However, this is not considered a "long term" solution for <br />increasing the total height above 6 feet as the safety factor would de~:rease <br />' significantly with increasing height. <br />_7_ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.