Laserfiche WebLink
r <br />Memo to File C-81-025, 2000 ARR <br />March 2, 2001 <br />Page 2 of 2 pages <br />The less than 0.1 acre areas of disturbance were seeded during 2000. <br />Rule 2.04.13(1)(f): Location, number of acres and date of planting for all previously revegetated <br />areas. <br />The report consists of a form developed by the Division, and additional text submitted by the <br />applicant. The location, number of acres, and yeaz of seeding of all previously revegetated azeas was <br />provided in the text. An excellent recapitulation of acreage was provided in this report. <br />Rule 2.04.13(2): The perntittee may provide additional monitoring information as required by the <br />approved penrtit. <br />Scientific sampling (vegetation) was accomplished during 2000. Information on the sampling <br />was not provided in the report. Weed control was reported performed. The only areas of <br />disturbance not identified in the report (in the table) are the areas of the flumes on Middle and <br />North Thompson Creek. The permittee is asked to include these areas. The disturbed areas <br />depicted on a map of the report do not identify the Stony Ridge Fan Shaft Road, or [he spur road <br />to the New Fan Shaft Site, as disturbed areas. The permittee is asked to revise the map to include <br />these areas. The Refuse Sedimentation Pond is mislabeled as P-9 on the map. The permittee is <br />asked to correct the label. The report is ambiguous with regard to the reclamation of <br />Sedimentation Pond P-9 by double entry into the recapitulation table. The permittee is asked to <br />clarify the entries. <br />Cc: Dan Hernandez, CDMG <br />Minrec, Inc. <br />