My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP26816
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP26816
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:57:54 PM
Creation date
11/27/2007 4:34:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982057
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
5/5/2006
Doc Name
2005 Revegetation Monitoring Report
From
Seneca Coal Company
To
DMG
Permit Index Doc Type
Reveg Monitoring Report
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
stems per acre, and thus a rise of 5x in woody plant density has occurred from <br />• the two-year old stage to the 7-year otd stage. Between 2000 and 2005, the <br />numbers of both big sagebrush and mountain snowberry both "substantially <br />increased as did serviceberry. Both Gambel's oak and chokecerry decreased <br />but still are present at the rate of 20 to 40 per acre. The tall shrub species <br />though surviving have yet to make sufficient top-growth to begin to achieve their <br />full potential height. <br />In the 2003 reclamation area, the 2005-observed woody plant density level of 32 <br />stems per acre is low even for such young revegetation. <br />Species Diversity and Composition <br />The 1998 reclaimed area is dominated by native perennial cool season grasses <br />and native perennial forts (twenty species present), comprising together nearly <br />55 percent of total vegetation cover (Figure 5). <br />The distribution of species density by lifeform (Figure 4) shows that the 1998 and <br />2003 reclaimed areas are more similar to the reference areas than would appear <br />to be the case from the lifeform distribution of relative cover (Figure 5). This is <br />important in that it shows that the basic components of the original ecosystem <br />have indeed been returned and that it is a matter of relative proportions that <br />separates the reclaimed from the native vegetation. Perhaps the largest <br />difference with regard to species density is in the native perennial forts category, <br />where native areas (at least the most extensive native types of Mountain Brush <br />and Sagebrush) tend to have half again to twice as many species of native <br />perennial forts per 100 sq.m. 2005 data for total native species density in the <br />1998 reclamation areas was 20.8 species per 100 sq.m. in 2005, up more than 7 <br />species per 100 sq.m. since year 2000 (13.2 species per 100 sq.m.; ESCO <br />2001). <br />Sample Adequacy <br />A summary of sample adequacy calculations.for the parameters of cover, <br />herbaceous production, and woody plant density is presented in Table 16 <br />16 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.