My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP26816
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP26816
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:57:54 PM
Creation date
11/27/2007 4:34:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982057
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
5/5/2006
Doc Name
2005 Revegetation Monitoring Report
From
Seneca Coal Company
To
DMG
Permit Index Doc Type
Reveg Monitoring Report
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />SenecallW 2005 <br /> <br />Phase III Herbaceous Production Standard <br /> <br />Vegetation Type Mean Herbaceous <br />Production (Ib/ac) % of Affected <br />Area <br />Sagebrush/Snowberrys 1,547 31.3 <br />Mountain Brushe 1,367 34.5 <br />Aspen Woodlands 1,736 11.0 <br />Steep Mountain Brush 748 12.8 <br />Alkali SagelWest Whtgrs. 1,411 10.4 <br />1998 Reclamation Area 2,525 NA <br />2003 Reclamation Area 3,108 tJA <br />Herbaceous production performance standard (weighted by percent of affected <br />area) = 1,389 Iblac. <br />• 90 percent of performance standard = 0.9 x 1,389 = 1250 Ib/ac <br />e Seneca IIW extended reference area values from data collected in 2005 <br />b Seneca 11WS extended reference area values from data collected in 1997; it is <br />likely that values from 2005 would have somewhat lower, so the calculated <br />standard is probably somewhat high. <br />As can be seen, the observed herbaceous production in both the 1998 and 2003 <br />reclaimed areas greatly exceeded the production standard. Since the clipping for <br />interim monitoring does not separate the annuals from perennials, the exclusion <br />of annuals from allowable production is not known. It is thought that certainly no <br />more than one-third (and probably quite a bit less) of observed total production <br />would be disallowed, still leaving plenty to exceed 90% of the standard. <br />Woody Plant Density <br />2005 data from the 1998 reclaimed area indicate the presence of about 1299 <br />woody plant stems per acre. In 2000 the number for woody plants was only 230 <br />15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.