My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP26340
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP26340
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:57:36 PM
Creation date
11/27/2007 4:28:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977439
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
9/21/1988
Doc Name
OPPOSITION TO STERLING SPECIAL REVIEW
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
111
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
i~ • • <br /> <br /> Larimer County Commissioners <br /> 200 West Oak <br /> Fort Collins, CO 80521 <br /> September 19, 1988 <br /> Gentlemen; <br /> Regarding Sterling Sand and Gravel Special Review #Z-17-88. <br />' I bring to your attention the appaling use of the county system in <br /> regard to this issue. As one member of the local neighborhood Troup <br /> I have witnessed blatant bias for big business regarding gravel <br /> mining in our area. I ask you why after repeated hearings and sufficient <br />' proof against your county regulations on land use are we still <br /> battling mining on this property. <br />' Both hydrologists have concluded water tables would drop, mitigation <br /> has been suggested. Sterling insists there will be no effect. WHY <br /> then is mitigation necessary? On every issue; water, noise, public <br /> health, public welfare and prosperity mitigation has been offerE~d. <br /> Mitigation is not the issue here, LAND USE REGULATIONS are and this <br /> proposal, because of it's location and proximity to our properties, <br />' DOES NOT MEET LAND USE REGULATIONS as established by Larimer County. <br /> Time and time again Sterling has not lived up to it's commitments, <br /> even as recently as negotiations Sterling in my opinion has not dealt <br /> with the landowners in good faith. <br /> Once again, on September 26, 1988 we, as a small residential group <br /> will stand up and fight the proposed mining of this property. We <br /> have the evidence and we have dealt in good faith for the past eight <br /> months. I can only hope that you, the commissioners, review the <br /> material, and make the only decision which the evidence supports; <br /> Mining is not harmonious with with the area and mitigative efforts <br /> are only concilatory in nature. <br />' Kind Regards. <br /> Sincerely, <br /> <br /> Richard W. Miller <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.