REP26016 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Cover data from the eight reclaimed areas and two reference areas are shown in Tables 1 through 10. Shown in each table are absolute top layer foliar cover by species, frequency by species, and relative top layer vegetation cover by species, all organized by lifeform/provenance categories. In addition, absolute all-hit cover and relative cover based on all-hit data are presented in these tables. All-hit data include first hits combined with additional hits below first hits, thus giving an accounting of cover conditions for all vegetation layers or strata. Figure 1 graphically depicts the summarized cover data tabulated in Table 42, comparing cover values to Mountain Brush and Sagebrush Reference Area standards. Cover (plus the confidence limit) in the 1988 Wolf Creek, Wadge Pasture, and Wadge Pasture '91 all exceed the cover standard set by 90 percent of the Sagebrush Reference Area. The 1985 Wadge comes within 0.3 percent of meeting that standard. Cover (even without the confidence limit) in the 1988 Wolf Creek, Wadge Pasture, and Wadge Pasture '91 areas also exceeds the confidence set by 90 percent of the Mountain Brush Reference Area. • Over the period of record (1987 to 1992), average vegetation cover in the reclaimed areas sampled was highest in 1987 (72.1 percent), slightly lower in 1988 (70.9 percent), and substantially lower in 1989 (48.4 percent), and then rebounded back to 60.2 percent in 1990 and cohtinued upward in 1991 to 65.4 percent. In 1992, the average dropped slightly to 61.9 percent (see Table 42 of this report and cover tables in Appendix 1 of the 1987, 1988, 1989, 1990, and 1991 Revegetation Monitoring Reports for the Seneca II Mine). This pattern was also seen in the Sagebrush Reference Area where cover fell from 1987 to 1989, rebounded in the 1990 data, continued to rise in the 1991 data, and then declined to approximately 1990 level. In the Mountain Brush Reference Area, however, the trend of falling cover between 1987 and 1989 continued in 1990 with a drop of two percent over 1989 levels, rebounded up over 7 percent in 1991, and then declined in 1992. In the Wadge Pasture area, which had likewise continued to drop from 1988 to 1990, the cover percentage rebound in 1991 was the largest of all (over 13 percent). Although the Wadge Pasture cover declined in 1992, it still had more cover than any of the ungrazed reclaimed areas, as well as more than the Sagebrush Reference Area and almost as much as the Mountain Brush Reference Area. e