My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP24924
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP24924
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:56:42 PM
Creation date
11/27/2007 4:06:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977211
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
5/30/2002
Doc Name
2002 Annual Report
From
Castle Concrete Company
To
DMG
Permit Index Doc Type
Annual Fee / Report
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
In Support Lands <br />Topsoiling <br />15.64 <br />6.3 <br />UPDATE 2002: The maps used for the 2000-2001 Annual <br />Report will be used for the 2001-2002 Annual Report. <br />Due to minor difficulties <br />Report production to a ne <br />hand-drawn this year. <br />with efforts to shift Annual <br />w system, changes will be <br />Map Category <br />Total Affected <br />Active Mining <br />Revegetation <br />Sn Quarry <br />Land <br />(extraction only) <br />In Support Lands <br />Topsoiling <br />Topsoil Stockpiling <br />Acreage <br />- 132.5 <br />17.7 <br />- 30 <br />-- 14 <br />16 <br />3 <br />Topsoils are continuing to be contributed to this operation from <br />various projects throughout the northern part of Colorado <br />Springs. This soil is being gathered through the combined <br />efforts of the CMRF and Castle Concrete. Much of the reclamation <br />done during the last year utilized some of this soil and <br />although it is still too early to determine the compatibility of <br />the soil with the site, initial assessments indicate a <br />reasonably high compatibility. Weed introduction from these <br />soils will be watched closely as that has been a serious problem <br />at Queens Canyon Quarry. Chemical controls may be necessary. <br />This has become a serious problem with using the introduced <br />soils, but the advantages of these soils appear to greatly <br />outweighed the disadvantages. <br />UPDATE 2001: Some topsoil collection from small <br />volume donations is occurring in the vicinity of the <br />office. However, this is starting to create a space <br />problem. This material may soon be stopped for awhile <br />until the amount of material can be consumed. <br />UPDATE 2002: Topsoil collection has exceeded <br />expectations. At the present time Castle Concrete has <br />a surplus of topsoil and is no longer accepting <br />donations from the public. In the future when topsoil <br />Castle Concrete 2002 Annual Report M-77-211 Pikeview Quarry Page 3 of 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.