My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP24825
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP24825
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:56:39 PM
Creation date
11/27/2007 4:05:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981014
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
8/21/2003
Doc Name
2002 AHR Review Memo
From
Jim Burnell
To
Jim Stark
Annual Report Year
2002
Permit Index Doc Type
Hydrology Report
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2002 water year. No flows were reported in Magpie Creek, Second Alkali Creek or at <br />the downstream monitoring point of Newlin Creek for the most recent period reported <br />(2001). Oak Creek reported flows only during the 2"d quarter (5-22-O1) of the most <br />recent reporting period (2001). <br />1. There will be temporary increases in runofffrom surface disturbance. <br />That is intuitive, but there is no confirmation. Certainly any increases have been minor <br />and of little overall effect. <br />2. There will be minor reductions in surface flows because of the sediment control <br />ponds. <br />This has not been significant overall. In the PHC of the permit, the total storage capacity <br />of the ponds is compazed to the total surface flow through the permit area, with a <br />maximum of 4.01 acre-feet of storage capacity representing 0.2% of the surface flow on <br />Newlin Creek. Even full to capacity, the amount of water retained in the ponds would <br />represent an insignificant reduction in the surface flows, as asserted in the PHC. There <br />were no discharges from the ponds during the 2002 water year. <br />3. There will be an alteration ofsurfaceflowpatterns. <br />This is an insignificant effect. <br />4. There will be changes in surface water chemistry. <br />See response to #5 below. <br />5. There will be increases in total dissolved solids (TDS) and some other constituents. <br />No data aze available from the most recent reporting period for Newlin Creek, Magpie <br />Creek or Second Alkali Creek, as they reported no flows in 2002. The perennial stream, <br />Oak Creek, is the one for which this prediction can be tested. Data exist for the upstream <br />site since 1997, and from the downstream location since 1983. Note that Oak Creek does <br />not flow through the mine site itself, but the loadout area. <br />Using the 2001 sampling, there appear to be changes in water chemistry from the <br />monitoring point upstream of the loadout to that downstream. Effects predicted in the <br />PHC are increases in conductivity and attendant TDS (from 570 mg/1 upstream to 730 <br />mg/1 downstream). There were very slight increases in other consiituents: in <br />bicarbonate (229 mg/1 to 242 mg/1, although probably close to the error limits); calcium <br />(from 90 to 100 mg/1), chloride (from 10 to 12 mg/1), magnesium (from 25.8 to 27.6 <br />mg/I); nitrogen (0.25 to 0.46 mg/1), and copper (0 to 0.46 mg/1). The most significant <br />increase was in sodium (51 to 330). <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.