Laserfiche WebLink
<br />June 30, 1992 <br />Page 8 <br />CYCC Response <br /> <br />As previously discussed, the A thru C series spoil springs and <br />sampling point D-Comp all daylight within 5o yards of one another, <br />and therefore are sampled as a weighted composite of all springs <br />for the full suite analysis as previously approved by the Division <br />under the spoil spring monitoring section. Results are reported <br />under the D-Comp spoil spring data listing. CYCC failed to transfer <br />this information into the C-1 data listing in the referenced <br />report, hence the confusion which arose. CYCC will make every <br />effort in the future to ensure that the pertinent data is <br />transferred to the appropriate data listings. <br />MLRD Concern <br />As expected, EC and dissolved solid values are high in many of the <br />spoil springs. Spring 114 historically is of poor quality, but no <br />increasing trend is evident since its development. <br />CYCC Response <br />No response required. <br />MLRD Concern <br />Ponds <br />High EC and dissolved solids are noted in Pond D and Pond F. As <br />most ponds do not flow except in the spring, developing trends are <br />not apparent. <br />CYCC Response <br />No response required. <br />MLRD Concern <br />Conclusion <br />Continued review of these data through the Annual Hydrologic <br />Reports for Eckman Park, Mines 1, 2 and 3 and Foidel Creek will <br />insure that developing trends will be identified as early as <br />possible in this complex hydrologic system. After review of the PHC <br />and this report, the Division has determined that no material <br />damage is evident at this time. Your diligence in adhering to your <br />monitoring program is appreciated. <br />