Laserfiche WebLink
<br />June 30, 1992 <br />Page 5 <br />MLRD Concern <br /> <br />Site 8 is missing one measurement for field parameters. Please <br />explain. <br />CYCC Response <br />The field sample of 9/29 was not input <br />not reported. Pertinent values were: <br />Time - 0650 <br />Level - (-)1.54 <br />Temp - 17' C <br />EC - 2840 <br />pH - 7.9 <br />MLRD Concern <br />Ponds <br />All requirements were met. <br />CYCC Response <br />No response required. <br />MLRD Concern <br />Spoil Springs <br />All requirements were met. <br />CYCC Response <br />No response required. <br />MLRD Concern <br />Water Ouality Analysis <br />correctly and as such was <br />Bedrock Wells <br />I concur with the ststement that 006-82-74c and 009-79-4 appear to <br />be affected by seepage from the spoils aquifer with regard to EC, <br />dissolved solids, and sulfate. However, it is not apparent that <br />026-79-4 is affected, as quality analysis shows the EC, TDS, and <br />sulfate to be considerably lower. Generally, it appears that the <br />bedrock wells higher in the drainage have overall better quality <br />than wells lower along the drainage, which seems logical. <br />