My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP23389
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP23389
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:55:48 PM
Creation date
11/27/2007 3:41:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
8/28/1997
Doc Name
ANNUAL SUBSIDENCE MONITORING REPORT YEAR END REPORT WEST ELK MINE PN C-80-007
From
DMG
To
MOUNTAIN COAL CO
Permit Index Doc Type
SUBSIDENCE REPORT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
STATE OF COLORADO <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />Depanmenl of Natural Resources <br />1 313 Sherman St., Room 215 <br />Denver, Colorado 80'07 <br />Phone: (7031 866-3567 <br />FAX: (3031 832-A106 <br />DATE: August 15, 1996 <br />TO: Michael Boulay <br />FROM: Jim Pendleton <br />RE: Mountai oat Co any, June, 1997 <br />Annual u ce Monitoring Report for 1996 <br />(Permit No: C-80-007) <br />~~~ <br />DEPARTMENT OF <br />NATURAL <br />RESOURCES <br />Roy Ramer <br />Governor <br />lames 5 Lachhead <br />Eaecmrve Dnetlor <br />Michael B Long <br />Division Director <br />I have reviewed the Year-End Subsidence Annual Report for 1996 submitted by Mountain <br />Coal Company for mining within the "F" and "B" seams at their West Elk Mine. This report <br />contains a straight forward rendition of the survey data for Mountain Coal Company's <br />numerous subsidence monitoring points. The maximum reported vertical subsidence <br />continues to be less than the predicted magnitude contained within MCC's amended permit <br />application. <br />The annual report is intended to contain an in depth discussion of the observed movement. <br />The Division amended Mountain Coal's (MCC's) permit requirements to require a brief <br />discussion in the semi-annual report, as well. MCC's brief cover letter discussion and <br />detailed data report are acceptable in regards to monitoring observations. However, I do not <br />believe that their one paragraph discussion of the results of visual monitoring is adequate. <br />I believe it would be appropriate to indicate the location of cracking and "scars" on the <br />subsidence map. Indications of crack extent, date of first observance, and notes concerning <br />subsequent "healing" would also be appropriate <br />cc: Dave Berry <br />doc: M:\COAL\JAP\MTG1697.SUB <br />JP\jp <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.