My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP23225
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP23225
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:55:42 PM
Creation date
11/27/2007 3:38:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981028
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
2/27/2004
Doc Name
2003 Annual Hydrology Report & Reclamation Report
From
Coors Energy Company
To
DMG
Annual Report Year
2003
Permit Index Doc Type
Hydrology Report
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
154
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
i Savage and Savage <br />Memorandum <br />To: Donald W. MacDonald, Coors Energy Compaq <br />From: Michael Savage, Savage and Savage, Inc. <br />Date: January 9, 2003 <br />Subject: First Quarter 2003 Pest and Disease Inspection; Keenesburg Mine <br />File #: C-81-028 <br />On January 9, 2003 I conducted an inspection of the reclaimed and revegetated areas at <br />the Keenesburg Mine for evidence of plant pests or diseases that could affect the re- <br />established vegetation at the Keenesburg Mine. <br />All reclaimed and revegetated areas of the mine, including the 1985, 1986, 1987, 1995, <br />1998 interseedings, 1999, 2000, and 2002 seedings were inspected by pedestrian and <br />vehicle means. The dugout area, the small cottonwood grove, and the B Pit areas were <br />also inspected for a~ potential weedy invasive species. I did not identify a~ disease <br />wnditions at a~ of the reclaimed and revegetated areas or within the mine site. Nor did I <br />identify a~ plant pests which had affected the growth of the vegetation during the past <br />growing season. No areas which experienced a~ infestation or blight were found during <br />the inspection. <br />The surface of the soil at the mine site in the reclaimed and revegetated areas was dry. No <br />surface erosion was observed within any of the reclamation areas. Even with the drought <br />conditions, there is sufficient vegetative ground cover and litter to control wind erosion in <br />the revegetated areas. In the newly reclaimed areas where the AI amendments have been <br />added, they have also contnbuted to mininrizing wind erosion <br />C: Keenesburg Pest and Disease Inspection File <br />Danny Kipp, Keenesburg Mine <br /> <br />AHR-2003 -45- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.