My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP23087
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP23087
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:55:37 PM
Creation date
11/27/2007 3:37:56 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1988112
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
7/22/1993
Doc Name
REVIEW OF SAN LUIS PROJECT PHASE II RAISE 1 DESIGN REPORT BATTLE MOUNTAIN RESOURCES INC FN M-88-112
From
BATTLE MOUNTAIN RESOURCES INC
To
DMG
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
~~ <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />Dephrtment of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman 51., Room 215 <br />Denver, CO 80203 <br />Phone: (303) 866-3567 <br />FAX: (J03) 832-8106 <br />ti~ <br />~~ <br />'revs <br />Roy Romer <br />Gvemor <br />Michael B. Long <br />July, 21 1993 oivi:ian 0irec,or <br />TO: Larry Oehler <br />FROM: Allen Sorenson <br />RE: Design Report for the First Upstream Raise at the San Luis <br />Mine Tailing Impoundment, Battle Mountain Resources, Inc., <br />File No. M-88-112 <br />Battle Mountain Gold (BMG) and their consultan#s, Steffen, <br />Robertson, and Kirsten.(SRK), have prepared and submitted a design <br />report which addresses the suitability of the in-situ tailing as a <br />foundation for the phase II upstream raises. Subm>_ tal of this <br />report is a result of commitments made by BMG in the ~pproved mine <br />plan to verify design assumptions through monitoring, testing, and <br />analysis as the tailing impoundment was developed. <br />As part of the monitoring program incorporated into the San Luis <br />Project mine plan, BMG was to install and `monitor'piezometers <br />within the tailing emban}anent. Readings of the five vibrating wire <br />piezometers installed in the embanlanent indicate that a structure <br />is unsaturated,. as designed, however, inctinsi tencies in <br />temperature `readings provided ly.'the'piezometers:demo strate that <br />the instruments are~not functioning properly, and the piezometric <br />data cannot lie used with reliability. <br />It is critical, in terms of embatLlonent stability, that the phreatic <br />surface, or lack thereof, within the embankment be monitored. BMG /~2 <br />should be required to install properly functioning piezometers <br />within the embankment sufficient to fully cliara~terize the <br />saturated or unsaturated state of embankment materials prior to <br />construction of the phase II raises. Installation of the <br />piezometers must be carefully supervised to preclude the <br />possibility of damaging the synthetic liner beneath the embankment. <br />LIQUEFACTION AND STABILITY ANALYSES <br />In adequacy responses submitted during consideration of the San <br />Luis Project permit amendment, the operator stated: <br />STATE OF COLORADO <br />The Phase 2 raises will be founded upon unsaturatied tailings <br />sand and the embankment itself, therefore, the design has <br />assumed liquefaction in this area cannot occur. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.