Laserfiche WebLink
<br />' January 1997 Km Coal Company • 1996 Annual Hydrology Report " CO Permit No. G80~006 ~ 3 <br />3.0 MINE AREA CONFINED GROUND WATER <br />1 <br />Confined ground water occurs in two water-bearing zones at the mine site: Mine Area Coal <br />' Aquifer and Mine Area Overburden. The Mine Area Coal Aquifer is monitored at well 79-61. <br />This well is located just north of the historic Pit 1, along Bush Draw, in the undisturbed coal seam. <br />The Mine Area Overburden wells are designated 79-1 and 79-2. These wells aze located at the <br />' north and south ends of the historic 720 Pit, adjacent to what was historically the east crest of the <br />ptt. See Map 1, Mine Area Monitortng Sites, for general locations. <br />' Ground water levels were measured and samples taken from these wells during October 1995 and <br />April 1996, as designated in the Monitoring Plan. The field data from the Confined Ground Water <br />Wells aze contained in Exhibit A, 1996 Field Data. The individual analyses of samples collected <br />' are presented in Exhibit B, 1996 Coal Aquifer Water Quality Analyses and Exhibit C, 1996 <br />Overburden Water Quality Analyses. The water quality data are summazized on Table 1, 1996 <br />Ground Water Quality Statistics. Figure 1, Mine Area Aquifer Water Level, shows the relative <br />' ground water levels for the coal and overburden aquifers over the past five yeazs. The sample <br />analysis results from the Confined Ground Water wells collected under recommended revised <br />sampling methods starting in April 1996 vary from previous sampling episodes. The results from <br />' the revised methodology will be observed through the 1997 sampling year for any new trends. <br />3.1 MINE AREA COAL AQUIFER <br />' The mine area coal aquifer well (79-b1) was monitored and sampled in October 1995 and April <br /> 1996. Table 1, 1996 Ground Water Quality Statistics, presents the water quality summary for the <br /> year. In general, [he coal aquifer, remains lower in total dissolved solids (TDS) than the <br />' overburden aquifer, suggesting little interaction between the aquifer systems. For companson <br /> purposes, the mean field and laboratory parameter values for Well 79~i1 over the last five years aze <br />' presented in Table 2, Historic Mine Area Coal Aquifer Water Quality Data. <br /> Figure 2, EC vs TDS, Well 79-61, presents a comparison of electrical conductance (EC) to TDS <br /> concentrations aver the last five years. The values plotted represent actual levels measured rather <br />' than a mean value. As seen in Figure 2, EC vs TDS -Well 79-61, the quality of ground water in <br /> the coal aquifer exhibits strong seasonal vaziability, probably related to infiltration of snow melt. <br /> 3.2 MINE AREA OVERBURDEN <br /> Table 1, 1996 Ground Water Quality Statistic, also includes a summary of the field and lab resulu <br />' for the yeaz from wells 79-1 and 79-2. <br /> For comparison purposes, the mean field and laboratory parameter values for the last five years <br />' aze presented in Tables 3 and 4, Historic Mine Area Overburden Water Quality Data. As shown, <br /> there have been minor fluctuations in concentration values, but there have not been identifiable <br /> trends on a yeazly basis. Figure 3, EC vs TDS, Well 79-1, and Figure 4, EC vs TDS, Well 79-2, <br />' show comparisons and trends over the past five years. <br />'~.~ti i eti rmunu.nrnrrvono rrrt TmaMatriz Inc. ' 1? O. Box 774078 'Steamboat Springs, Colorado 80477 "(970J 8796260 <br />