My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP21902
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP21902
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:55:01 PM
Creation date
11/27/2007 3:17:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982055
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
3/4/2004
Doc Name
2003 Annual Reclamation Report
From
Energy Fuels Mining Company
To
DMG
Permit Index Doc Type
Annual Reclamation Report
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ReveEetated Areas <br />No areas were revegetated during the reporting period. (Interseeding was done on the spread <br />sediment soil and along contour ditches). <br />Previously Reveeetated Areas <br />EFMC revegetated approximately 25.1 acres of the reclaimed mine site azea during the spring and <br />fall of 1995 following completion of backfilling and grading operations. Limited interseeding was <br />conducted in 1996, 1999, 2000 and 2003. The color-coded perimeters of the initial permanently <br />seeded azea, and subsequently interseeded areas, aze shown on attached Figure 1, Mine Site. <br />Additional Monitoring~rformation <br />EFMC did not conduct vegetation monitoring during the reporting_period. <br />Noxious Weed Monitoring <br />During a CDMG inspection of the site, the inspector noted a small patch of White-Top <br />thistle directly south of the shop facilities building. EFMC contacted Peak Project Management <br />who immediately sprayed the thistle with the approved noxious weed spray mix. EFMC plans to <br />monitor the existing noxious weed location as well as the entire reclaimed area in the coming <br />growing season, and will continue to mitigate noxious weed establishment. <br />Conclusions <br />Vegetation reestablishment on the site has been impacted by drought conditions and by <br />previous cattle grazing/use by the landowner. Consequently, in an effort to reduce the impact from <br />cattle grazing/use, Energy Fuels contacted the landowner both verbally and by letter during April, <br />2003 requesting that he remove the cattle from the site until such time that the vegetation was <br />evaluated and approved as adequate for grazing. Subsequent to discussions with the landowner <br />about the request, he agreed to remove the cattle from the reclamation area. During the months <br />following the agreement to yeaz end, no signs of cattle grazing were found within the reclaimed <br />site area. Energy Fuels appreciates the cooperation of the landowner and the support of the <br />Division to gain relief of the grazing/use stress for the reclaimed land. We hope Nature will <br />relieve the stress of drought as well. <br />EFMC will continue to closely monitor the erosion and vegetation status on the reclaimed <br />azeas. Overall, reclamation of the disturbed azeas continues to effectively minimize the previous <br />mining impacts and promote establishment of the site to its approved postmining land use <br />capabilities. <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.