My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP21773
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP21773
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:54:57 PM
Creation date
11/27/2007 3:15:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981034
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
6/20/1986
Doc Name
SUBSIDENCE MONITORING FN C-81-034
From
GRAND MESA COAL CO
To
MLR
Permit Index Doc Type
SUBSIDENCE REPORT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
:. <br />~~ • <br />Grand Mesa <br />Coal Company <br />-. <br />June 17, 1986 <br />~ ~~ <br /> <br />P. O. Box 1351 <br />Palisade, CO 81526 <br />(303) 464-7951 <br />,,. <br />~uN 2 o rsas <br />John T. Doerfer <br />Reclamation Specialist <br />Colorado Mined Land Reclamation <br />423 Centennial Building <br />1313 Sherman Street <br />Denver, Colorado 80203-2273 <br /> <br />Subject: Subsidence Monitoring - File No. C-81-034 <br />Dear John: <br />The following table tabulates the past two quarters of subsidence monitoring <br />on part of the monitoring points. The points being monitored are houses 2, <br />6, 7 and 8 and the control to these houses. These houses are being monitored <br />because mining has been done within their projected zone of influence as shown <br />on Map 2.05.6(6)(f)(ii)(c)-1 in our permit application. <br />The initial elevations were measured as baseline information in early 1982. <br />The "Elevation Change" is the current elevation minus the original elevation. <br />The "Relative Elevation Change" is the "Elevation Change" of the point minus <br />the "Elevation Change" of the backsite. <br />Elevations for the baseline and subsequent monitoring on the sub-points have <br />been calculated using vertical angles. Sub 0, Q and S show the greatest relative <br />elevation changes. The surveys of these points were done according to the <br />attached Second Order, Class II guidelines. These points show movement according <br />to the guidelines. All three points are outside the projected zone of influence <br />of mining, therefore, the movement is not believed to be associated with mining. <br />Elevations for the baseline and subsequent monitoring on the house have been <br />calculated using a level loop from the closest sub-point. None of the houses <br />show major re]ative elevation changes that would indicate subsidence. <br />We propose to monitor these points one additional time and then suspend monitoring <br />'' unless there are visual indications of subsidence. The original survey and <br />four quarterly surveys will be used to calculate new baseline elevations. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.