My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP21624
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP21624
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:54:53 PM
Creation date
11/27/2007 3:12:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977573
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
1/23/2004
Doc Name
Report on Permit
From
Southwestern Ecological Services
To
DMG
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
57
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Possible Resolution Solutions: A shown on Plates 7 through 11, there is a considerable <br />overlap between the Project and the Reclamation Permit area. It would be desirable to remove as <br />much of this land as possible from the permit so the Project can proceed without an additional <br />layer of oversight by the Division of Minerals and Geology. It is clear that the project is well <br />planned and bids have already been requested and contracts will soon be completed to start the <br />Project work. However, it is also recognized that the permittee must retain responsibility for all <br />lands outside the Project comdor. The problem then is finding a way to fit the two together <br />without taking a risk of opening the door to inadequate land rehabilitation. <br />The Project land involves three categories of permitted land. First, the work along the <br />river, for the most part, will occur near the bank and generally within the permit setbacks from <br />the river. Most of that land has not been affected during the mining, but not all. Second, the Right <br />of Way line for the project encroaches significantly into land that was affected during mining and <br />is now in various stages of reclamation. And third, are the access corridors to do the work in the <br />river habitat restoration. Clearly, the first step is to identify how many acres are involved in the <br />primary project activity which is within the Right of Way. The following table tallies the <br />acreages determined from an examination of Plates 7 through 11. <br />Plate Number Permitted and unaffected Affected and in R.O.W. <br />7 0 0 <br />8 3.02 0.28 <br />8 1.74 2.86 <br />8 1.56 <br />9 4.78 1.89 <br />9 1.65 <br />10 3.84 1.75 <br />10 2.06 2.86 <br />11 2.02 1.94 <br />Totals 20.67 acres 11.58 acres <br /> Grand Total 32.25 acres <br />Notes: Land that iswi[hin the Project area but has already been released is not <br />included in the acreages. The access routes are not included as a <br />separate category; those will be discussed separately. <br />Permitted and Unaffected Land: It seems clear that this category (totaling 20.67 acres) <br />is the easiest category to deal with. Although permitted, this land has not been affected. No <br />expansion of the existing disturbances within the permit is expected in the course of completing <br />the reclamation. Therefore, it seems reasonable that this land could be released from bond so at <br />least those portions of the Project can proceed without influence from the Reclamation Pennit. <br />This, by itself, would considerably alleviate any conflicts that might arise. <br />Pueblo West Pit and River Restoration Project Investigation Report Page 4 of 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.