Laserfiche WebLink
<br />• was measured by the pump ratings or by a direct volumetric measurema-t with <br />a calibrated container. <br />2.2 Ground Water <br />Quarterly ground water samples were taken at each of the stations <br />PAW-1, PAW-2, PAW-3, PAW-4, PA14-5, PAW-6 and CLAW-1. PAW-6 was sampled for <br />the discharge list on a quarterly basis. <br />Depths to water bela~r the top of the well casing was measu~ to <br />the nearest tenth-foot using an electric line water level detector. The <br />elevation at the top of the well casing was subtracted from the depth to <br />water to obtain the ground water level below the ground surface. <br />3.0 MCNI'iI~RING RESULTS <br />Surface water and ground water field parameters are surtQ~riz~ed in <br />• Tables 3 and 4. Appendices 1 and 2 contain all data collected for the first <br />quarter of 1987. <br />3.1 Surface Water <br />Stations PRS-1, PRS-2 and PRS-3 exhibited a higher flora during the <br />first quarter of 1987 o~ipare3 to the first quarter of 1986. Flea rakes <br />were 5.34 to 22.5 cfs (PR5-1 ); 6.54 to 24.75 (PRS-2; and 8.22 to 24.3 <br />(PRS-3). These flaw are a result of above average snowfall in northeastern <br />New Mexico and south ~ central Oolorado during February and March. <br />donductivities were slightly higher during taus reporting period ocmpared to <br />previous years and were within historical ranges. <br />Mine disc]targes remained unchanged. The Golden Eagle mine discharge pH <br />levels improved as all reported pH levels were below 9.0. WFC has <br />containued to treat the Golden Eagle discharge with hydrochloric acid as <br />necessary. Mine discharge fran the New Elk average was .11 mgd. The Golden <br />• Eagle mine discharge averaged .05 mgd. <br />