My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP21328
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP21328
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:54:45 PM
Creation date
11/27/2007 3:07:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982055
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Name
Review of 1986-1987 Hydrologic MONITORING Data
From
MLRD
To
ENERGY FUELS MINING CO
Permit Index Doc Type
HYDROLOGY REPORT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Mr. Gossett <br />- 2 - December 2, 1987 <br />In the third quarter of 1986, the mine continued to have problems with <br />maintaining discharges from the sediment pond within NPDES permitted limits <br />for settleable solids. Much of this difficulty was felt to be due to <br />excessive sediment in the pond resulting from severe downcutting in the <br />drainages emptying into the pond. Various steps were taken to reduce the <br />volume of sediment being discharged including cleaning the pond and installing <br />check dams in the ditch south of the refuse pile. Asa result, an apparent <br />reduction in the amount of settleable solids being discharged was noted in the <br />third quarter of 1986. There were no further violations in either the fourth <br />quarter of 1986 or.in the first quarter of 1987; although at least one <br />significant rain was recorded during November. Ownership and operation of the <br />mine charged during the second quarter 1987 (fourth quarter of the 1986-87 <br />monitoring year). Considerable additional effort was made by the new operator <br />to control the volume and velocity of flow in the disturbed area drainage <br />ditches; additional check dams were installed in the ditch south of the refuse <br />pile together with extensive rip-rap. The top of the refuse pile was regraded <br />to lessen the volume of water bing directed into the ditch on the north side <br />of the refuse pile. These measures appear to have been effective; there were <br />no NPDES violations noted during this quarter. <br />Ground Water <br />The operator is required to monitor water levels and water quality (field <br />parameters) in two local wells on a monthly basis. These are the refuse and <br />Iuppa wells. Analytical data is supplied for these wells each quarter. Prior <br />to September, 1986 the operator was voluntarily monitoring an additional well, <br />the Sundance well, on the same basis. As a result of budget concerns, <br />analytical data for the Sundance well was omitted from reports for the last <br />three quarters of the 1986-87 monitoring year. The analytical data supplied <br />during the 1986-87 monitoring year indicates the basic chemical character of <br />the waters in the refuse, Iuppa and Sundance wells is essentially unchanged <br />from previous years. Annual variations in TDS occur for all wells, but these <br />variations fall within the range previously recorded. The waters from the <br />three wells are chemically distinguishable from one another and probably <br />indicate separate sources or combinations of sources as previously reported <br />(see Annual Review of Hydrologic Monitoring Data for 1985-1986 dated <br />August 1, 1986). <br />Of the three wells, the refuse well exhibits the greatest annual variation in <br />TDS (and Ec). The zone across which this well is perforated or open may be <br />larger than in the other wells and perhaps subject to some surface recharge. <br />Chemically, this is also the only well of the three yielding water in which <br />dissolved quantities of selenium occasionally exceed drinking and agricultural <br />standards. These exceedances have also been true in past years. There may be <br />some relationship of these high selenium values to the mining operations. <br />Water in the adjacent sediment pond regularly contains selenium at the limit <br />recommended for drinking water; water from the permanent diversion ditch does <br />not. Water from the refuse well, however, is not put to any beneficial use. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.