Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />• <br /> <br />Hydrologic Dam fnrerprcrarion and Impact A.csectrnem /or the Permit and Adjacent Arcar <br />As expected, water was encountered in the sub- <br />main. Some water was anticipated because colluvi- <br />um overlays this submain. In addition, cover over <br />the area is low to moderate. Although the submain <br />was wet and Moors were muddy, the inflows were <br />not measurable. <br />Panel NWiS <br />During 1990, WECC began developing this panel <br />to the southwest from the Northwest Submains. <br />This development will continue in 1991. Also, the <br />2 Northwest Submain will be developed from this <br />panclin 1991. <br />Water conditions in this panel were similar to <br />those encountered in the 1 Northwest Submain. <br />Most of the developed area was we[ and muddy. <br />Also, none of the inflows were measurable. <br />"B" Seam Siopes <br />WECC began developing "B" seam access and <br />ventilation during 1990. Two parallel sloped <br />entries wcrc completed to provide access to the <br />"B" seam from the "F' seam. Once in the "B" <br />seam, two crosscuts wcrc developed south and cast <br />to the ventilation raise site. Work on the raise was <br />almost complete by the end of 1990. <br />No significant water was encountered during this <br />initial development of the "B" seam. The "B" seam <br />itself turned out to be the wettest of the three <br />areas. Roof drippers occurred following develop- <br />ment. Water from immeasurable drippers in one <br />arcs associated with a small fault at the bottom of <br />the slopes continues to accumulate in a sump area. <br />WECC anticipates minimal inflows from continued <br />development of the "B" scam. Based on overbur- <br />den conditions, only minimal inflows should occur. <br />Furthermore, (lows encountered during initial <br />development of the "B" seam were minor. Except <br />for the fault-associated drippers, (lows were not <br />measurable and subsequently dried up. <br />Water Quality <br />Samples taken during 1990 indicate water quality <br />in the mint to be good. Accordingly, it should pose <br />no problem for discharge. The discharges should <br />readily meet NPDES effluent limitations after <br />settling and should not measurably impact receiv- <br />ing waters. Quality of water discharged in 1991 <br />should be similar to the 1990 values shown in <br />Table 5. <br />11 <br />Groundwater <br />Some groundwater wells exhibited slightly changed <br />conditions in some instances and the subsidence <br />monitoring deep wells showed some in0uencc from <br />mining. Overall however, the wells remained fairly <br />constant compared to previous years. Most notably, <br />the 1990 data indicate: <br />• Refuse area wells SG-1 and GP-1 continued <br />to show lower levels than in years previous to <br />1987. This is due to persistent lower precipi- <br />tation paucrns. <br />• Refuse arcs wells GP-3 through GP-5, as in <br />previous years, contained no water. <br />• Barren Member well 38-H-I, as previously <br />described, was affected by subsidence. This <br />well has since recovered to nre-minine water <br />levels. <br />• Barren Member well 38-H-2 continued to <br />have casing blockage problems which oc- <br />curred after it was installed. Very little data <br />were collected at this well due to the prob- <br />lem. The casing was apparently damaged by <br />subsidence as described earlier in this section. <br />• Barren Member well 38-H-3 provided no <br />useful well data in 1990. Moisture problems <br />with the casing and later communication with <br />the mine workings, probably caused by subsi- <br />dence, precluded the determination of water <br />levels. <br />