My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP16179
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP16179
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:45:33 PM
Creation date
11/27/2007 1:48:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982056
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
12/29/1986
Doc Name
PRELIMINARY ADEQUACY COMMENTS ON TR 1 HYDROLOGIC MONITORING PLAN FISH CREEK LOADOUT C-81-036
From
MLRD
To
TWENTYMILE COAL CO
Permit Index Doc Type
HYDROLOGY REPORT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Claire Semmer <br />- 2 - December 29, 1986 <br />Please commit to placing water elevation measuring devices on streams <br />immediately adjacent to alluvial monitoring sites. This information will <br />be used to correlate discharge and recharge of the alluvium with the <br />stream. <br />3. The Division requests more detailed monitoring of Site 62, and recommends <br />that it be considered a general surface water site for purposes of the <br />monitoring plan. During 1986, a substantial quantity of water discharged <br />from this site despite minimal operational activities. The source of <br />/~ `~ this discharge is not clear at this time. Some surface water runoff was <br />undoubtedly present. Groundwater flow through the Fish Creek Tipple <br />~,° bench may have been responsible, or there may have been some groundwater <br />contribution from Mine 3 spoils south of the facility. The Division <br />1~~ iY ,/ avou3d like the source of this water to be better characterized and <br />W ~~`~rr S consequently also requests that water utilization records be submitted <br />~ ,,~,~From the well at the loadout to use in differentiating between <br />~Y'~,r~.operation-generated flows and other flows. <br />3, Include aluminum, copper and lead in the surface water parameter list and <br />add molybdenum to the groundwater monitoring list. Commit to monitoring <br />concentrations of nitrate, nitrite and nickel on both the ground water <br />and surface water list. Our rationale is as follows: <br />The Division requests continued monitoring of aluminum, copper and lead <br />because the downstream site, 1003, identified average concentrations for <br />these metals at levels approaching or higher than receiving stream <br />standards. <br />Average Concentrations of Selected Metals at Site 1003, 1985 <br />Average Concentration Receiving Stream Standard <br />Metal (mq/1) (mg/1) <br />~- <br />Cu 0.02 0.022 <br />Pb 0.03 0.07.5 <br />Mo 0.12 0.01 <br />As noted above, molybdenum values also exceed the agriculturally-based <br />receiving stream standard. The monitoring plan proposes to restrict <br />monitoring of molybdenum to surface waters. At this time it appears <br />appropriate to add molybdenum to the parameters monitored at groundwater <br />alluvial sites. <br />Nitrogen species are being analyzed currently as N03-NO2. Both <br />nitrate and nitrite have receiving stream standards; these are TO mg/1 <br />and 0.05 mg/1 respectively, The recent reported concentrations of <br />N03-N02 far exceed the receiving stream standard of NO2 of 0.05 <br />mg/1, (Site 1003, 1985 average, equaled 4.3 mg /1 ). Thus it is necessary <br />to analyze these parameters separately. <br />Overburden geochemistry analyses from Mine 3 suggest that nickel could <br />present a water quality problem. The Division requests that nickel be <br />monitored to evaluate the status of this prediction. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.