REP15926

• Permit No: C1984063
• IBM Index Class Name: Report
• Doc Date: 2/14/2003
• Doc Name: 2002 Annual Hydrology Report Review Memo
• From: Byron Walker
• To: File
• Annual Report Year: 2002
• Permit Index Doc Type: Hydrology Report
• Media Type: D
• Archive: No

STATE OF COLORADO
DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY
Department of Natural Resources
1313 Sherman St., Room 215
Denver, Colorado 80203 DIVISION o r
Phone. [phone] IVt [ l~l E RA L $
FAX: [phone] &
GEOLOGY
RECLAMATION
MININ G•SAFETY
interoffice
MEMORANDUM Bill Owens
Governor
to: File C-84-063 Eastslde lne Greg E. Walther
Executive Director
from: Byron G. Walker Ronaia w. cottony
subject: Review for Compliance, 2002 Annual Hydrology Report Division Director
date: February 14, 2003
Rule 4.05.13(4)(c): A hydrologic report shall be submitted to the Division annually with the date
ofsubmittal determined in consultation with the permittee. The annual hydrologic report shall
contain at a minimum:
The report is in compliance with this rule. The submittal date is "by the end of the following
February" (PAP page 59). The report, dated February 2003, was received in the Division of Minerals
and Geology (Division) on February 13, 2003 under a Stephen Self letter of February 11,2003.
Rule 4.05.13(4)(c)(i): Water quantity data obtained from each monitoring site during the water
year;
Water quantity data was submitted by calendar year in-lieu-of water year. The requirement is
calendar year (PAP page 59). There was no dischazge from the sedimentation pond (Report Page 3).
The introduction section of the report does not identify the dischazge point ofthe sedimentation pond
as a monitoring point, but it is described in the following description of water monitoring section.
The sedimentation pond was removed during the year.
Rule 4.05.13(4)(c)(ii): Water quality data obtainedfrom each monitoringsite during the water year,
and
The report is incompliance with this rule with the exception that water quality data was submitted by
calendar yeaz in-lieu-of water year (PAP page 59).
Rule 4.05.13(4)(c)(iii): If required by the Division, a written interpretation of the data and
identification of mining related impacts to the hydrologic balance.
The report is incompliance with this rule. The Division required no written interpretation ofthe data,
but a summary of impacts is provided in the report. There were no measurable impacts (Report Page
3). The probable hydraulic consequences are presented in the Permit. The prediction was that there
would be no water quality impact (Permit, page 63).