My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP15264
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP15264
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:44:51 PM
Creation date
11/27/2007 1:37:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981018
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
4/9/2001
Doc Name
2000 ANNUAL RECLAMATION REPORT DESERADO MINE PN C-1981-018
From
DMG
To
BLUE MOUNTAIN ENERGY INC
Permit Index Doc Type
ANNUAL RECLAMATION REPORT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2000 Revegetation Survey <br />Introduction <br />During July visual surveys of many revegetated areas were made. Each site was walked or <br />driven with an ATV to assess the entire site. Observations were then recorded on an <br />inspection form for future reference (see Appendix). The intent of the inspections were to: <br />1. Assess the effectiveness of past revegetation practices. <br />2. Identify potential problems that exist that may warrant further attention. <br />3. Provide insight to future revegetation efforts. <br />4. Provide information needed to develop strategies to correct potential deficiencies. <br />Areas surveyed included drill sites and degas borehole pads reclaimed in 1998 and 1999. <br />Other areas include RP-1, which was reseeded in 1997 and had limited maintenance in 2000, <br />B-vent Shaft and access road, and the Emergency coal stockpile area by TS-2. <br />Drill Sites & Deeas Borehole Pads <br />In general, the recently reclaimed sites were in fair to good condition. The sites reclaimed in <br />1998 were more mature and productive than the 1999 sites for obvious reasons. Dry <br />conditions preceding the inspection invoked dormancy in many of the seedlings. This made <br />the smaller seedlings, especially from the more recently reclaimed areas, less obvious. <br />However, species diversity was excellent on most of the 1998 seedings. Many shrubs and <br />fortis were prominent on many of the sites. Best forb and shrub establishment occurred on <br />harsh sites that had little competition from weeds. Where weed competition was greatest <br />perennial grass seedlings still persisted in adequate densities. <br />Refuse Area #1 <br />Refuse Area #1 was reseeded in the Fall of 1997. It was dominated by cheatgrass prior to the <br />reseeding. 2000 represents the third growing season for the latest seeding. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.