My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP14926
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP14926
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:44:37 PM
Creation date
11/27/2007 1:32:51 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2001035
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
7/8/2001
Doc Name
ENGINEERING GEOLOGIC SITE CHARACTERIZATION STUDY TROUT CREEK DAM SITE & RESERVOIR AREA CHAFFEE CNTY
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />R. J. Irish <br />Consulting Engineering <br />Geologist, Inc. <br />result, the risk oflandslides induced by reservoir water saturation or by reservoir water wave <br />action is assessed to below. <br />SITE SEISMICITY <br />Colorado in general, end the upper Arkansas Yellay in particular, ere not considered to be e <br />seismical) y active area, at least relative to the major earthquake belts of the world end of the <br />United States of America; but that statement does not imply that the region is free of earthquake <br />activity. In fact, some seismologists have suggested that the earthquake potential of the Colorado <br />section of the Rio Grande Rift has been underestimated. Faults bordering the graben formed within <br />the rift zone were initially activated during the early Miocene Period some 20 to 25 million years <br />ago. Linear scarps in geologically young alluvium, hot springs, and other manifestation of <br />reactivation for some of those faults, particularly in the Sen Luis Valley, have been interpreted by <br />some researchers to evidence fault movements that would have generated earthquakes essentially <br />into historical time; but reactivations during the lest 10,000 years have not been proven, except <br />possibly at one site on the Sangre de Cristo fault on the eastern side of the San Luis Valley, where a <br />reactivation date of about 2000 to 4700 years ego has been interpreted. A recurrence rate of <br />3000 to 5000 years has been suggested for that fault, but could be more li ke t 5,000 years. The <br />Sangre de Cristo fault may have been the most active fault in Colorado during the past few hundred <br />thousand to several million years, with fault movement-generated earthquakes having a maximum <br />magnitude of about 7.5. It lies within 50 to 60 miles of the planned damsite. <br />In the vicinity of Buena Vista and the Trout Creek damsite, vertical displacement on the <br />Sawatch fault on the western side of the Arkansas Valley duri ng the past 20 to 25 million years <br />has been about 12,000 feet. On the east side of the valley the graben-bounding faults adjacent to <br />the mouth of the canyon section of the Trout Creek Yellay appear to be hidden beneath all uvisl soils <br />deposited during the Ice-Age {2 million years ago to about 10,000 years ago} and after. Evidence <br />of fault reactivation younger than 2 million years has not been documented. <br />On the western side of the graben near Buena Vista, fault scarps in dateable soils suggest the most <br />recent fault reactivation was 4000 to 30,000 years ago, with a recurrence level of 10,000 to <br />40,000 years. The hot springs along the Sawatch Fault, notably et Chalk Creek west of Buena <br />Yiste,suggestcontinuing stress build-up. <br />All in ell, the evidence for relatively recent earthquake activity in the Arkansas Valley in the <br />vicinity of the damsite is more compelling than in the rest of the State of Colorado; but, even so, <br />the risk of a large earthquake impacting the dam during its life is considered to be low. <br />Conceivably a magnitude 6 or 7 earthquake could be generated within 5 miles of the damsite (e. g., <br />on the Sawatch Fault},and that could subject the dam foundation to a peak particle acceleration on <br />the order of 0. 3 to 0.4 q; but we consider the risk of occurrence of that size eerlhqueke to be low <br />7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.