Laserfiche WebLink
<br />R. J. Irish <br />Consulting Engineering <br />Geologist, Inc. <br />The intergrenuler permeability of the granitic rock at this demsite should be essentially zero, <br />but ground water is likely to course through joints end fractures. The permeability of the rock <br />mass due to those discontinuities may permit unacceptably high volumes of underseepage. This is <br />indicated by the results of pecker tests run in 2 of the 4 borings drilled near the planned damsite <br />(Fig. 3). for example, water "takes" fora 37- foot long section of rock penetrated by boring DH- <br />M-2 , a boring angled at 45 degrees from the horizontal, from 55 feet to 92 feet ranged from 7 to <br />13 to 29 gpm at pressures of 25, 50, and 100 psi, respectively. Consequently, curtain grouti ng <br />may 6e advisable. A single line of grout holes spaced on 5-foot centers and terminated at a depth of <br />about 35 feet should be adequate. Grout "takes" ere estimated to 6e on the order ofone-half sack <br />per foot of grout hole in the top 20 feet of the rack on the average, end about 1 sack per foot of <br />grout hole from 20 feet to 35 feet in the rock. A few open joints capable of taking 4 to S sacks of <br />grout could be intercepted. The grout holes should be angled about 45 degrees from the horizontal <br />so thatthey would interceptthe predominentlynaar-vertically dipping main joints or possibly <br />thin, near-vertically dipping sheer zones. <br />If the dam is to be founded on the alluvial soils their engineering performance character- <br />istics need to be established by laboratory testing of a suite of those soils. In particular, their <br />bearing capacity and permeability need io be determined . Almost certainly, the permeability of <br />those sandy soils would need to be reduced bygrouting--probably chemical grouting, because the <br />silt content of the soils appears to be too high to permit cement grouting. <br />The alluvial fan at the mouth of the gorge about aquarter-mile downstream from the demsite <br />is formed primarily of fine to coarse grained sands. We understand the engineering performance <br />characteristics of those sands have been determined by laboratory testing,end those results <br />indicate that the sands should be useable as fine concrete aggregate. <br />The soils downstream from the dam need io be protected from scour otherwise inherent to <br />spillway discharge. This protection could be provided by a concrete mat or a rock rip-rapped <br />channel. Rock suitable for that purpose could be quarried from the granodiorite either <br />immediately upstream or downstream from the damsite. Potential flood flow volumes should be <br />assessed by an hydrologist experiencedin that work. <br />The reservoir area essentially is enopen-ended basin of granitic rock locally mantled by <br />disconnected bodies of slopewash and residual soils across the valley slopes and by alluvial soils <br />across the valley floor. The alluvial soils appear to be ground water saturated to within a few <br />inches of the surface of the floor. Bank storage should be minimal. <br />The bedrock typically is massively jointed, and soil-blanketed slopes rarely ere steep. As e <br />6 <br />