Laserfiche WebLink
spring 8-41, located dovnatream of spring 9-23 along the 006 Ouleh, is again located in • <br />the channel of an ephemeral drainage. St is situated lust tlovnstream of the silted-in <br />Temple Fond Y2. It receives rater lrom numerwa seeps issuing from this marshy, silted-in <br />pond. The 8C plot reveals ro apparent trend. <br />spring a-5, located downstream of spring 9-41 along a side Qrar to the 006 Gulch, is also <br />in an ephemeral channel. The last flw monitored here ras In ,Tune, 1983, and is the only <br />sample on record. <br />spring 5-46 is a developed spring First monitoring during the 1979 spring Survey. This <br />spring is not past of the required monitoring program, hwever, due to its strategic <br />location (immediately belw the 005 Fand dam), monitoring at this spring has been <br />wluntuily mstabllahed in 1992. The 8C plot Sndicates a recently decreasing trend. <br />spring 8-67 ras first discovered by 9CC personal in 1989 and ras monitored first in June, <br />1990. It ie a developed spring existing alongside the mine entrance haul zoa6 ]ust to the <br />rest of the Seneca II-W Meteorological Station. it ie not required by the hydrological <br />monitoring program, monitoring is wluntary. Its SC plot indicates a reeestly decreasing <br />trend. • <br />spring a-4B, aka the Flandet's Spring, ras developed by SCC in the loll of 1992 per 3 land <br />o~mer's agreement rith Ralph Flanders. It is not required by the hydrological monitoring <br />program, monitoring is wluntary. The first lab sasple ras taken on June 27, 3994. An 8C <br />trend is not yet apparent due to the small number of samples. <br />The hydrology monitoring program at the senses II-W Mine requires a spoil spring survey <br />every year after the spring anowpack runolf. No spoil springs have Deen discovered. <br />Comparison of Surface Water Quality to Water Uae Standards. Of all the surface rater <br />sites dornatream of Seneca II-W, only Sites WeDS (Dry Creek) and WSSF3 (Sage Creek) have <br />their raters used for irrigation. Also, rater from Bite WSHF1 (lover 8ubberson Gulch) has <br />the potential oP being vaed for irrigation, although this has not been developed as such. <br />Water quality from these thm sites revs compared against irrigation atanw=+~~ (Table 5, <br />see Ormond Water section), and the comparison results are presented 1n Table 11 (Appendix <br />A). The comparison shwa sulfate valves at all thm sites and high manganese and iron • <br />values at Bites W8H1+1 and WEDS. <br />10 <br />