My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP12895
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP12895
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:43:25 PM
Creation date
11/27/2007 1:03:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980003
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
4/1/2002
Doc Name
2001 Annual Reclamation & Hydrology Report
From
Montgomery Watson Marza
To
DMG
Annual Report Year
2001
Permit Index Doc Type
Hydrology Report
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH AND ENVIItONMENT <br />WATER QUALITY CONTROL DIVISION <br />Water Quality Protection Section <br />Memorandum <br />To: File <br />From: -Jon Kubic~ <br />Date: September 28, 1999 <br />Subject: Inactivation Request <br />H-G Coal Company Hayden Gulch Mine <br />CDPS No. COG-850018 <br />Routt County <br />The permittee has requested inactivation. <br />The Colorado Division of Minerals and Geology (CDMG) has recently granted release of Phase II and <br />Phase III bond. As a condition of this approval, the CDMG has authorized leaving the two sedimentation <br />ponds that arc the sources of the remaining discharge poinu under this permit for use as livestock and <br />wildlife watering ponds. As such, the potential for point source discharges from these ponds will remain, <br />however, the sources will no longer be a regulated industrial activity but anon-regulated agricultural <br />activity. <br />Additionally, during my June 1998 site visit, I observed that then arc at least three spoils springs that <br />remain. None of these contribute significant flow and they usually do not reach either of the ponds. <br />Because they do not impact surface water, the CDMG has jurisdiction. They have determined that these <br />spoils springs are not of sigtificant concern. There is no basis for the Division [o disagree. <br />On the basis of the information detailed in this letter, I recommend inactivation. I also recommend that <br />the District Engineer not be requested to perform a site visit. There would be no benefit from such a <br />visit. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.