My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP12439
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP12439
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:43:10 PM
Creation date
11/27/2007 12:53:52 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981014
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
5/28/1992
Doc Name
1991 ANNUAL RECLAMATION REPORT SOUTHFIELD MINE COLO COAL MINING & RECLAMATION PN C-81-014
Permit Index Doc Type
ANNUAL RECLAMATION REPORT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Examination of these shrub species mentioned in the Divison's Vegetation <br />Guidelines with those at the Southfield Mine Grassland Reference Area, reveals <br />that excluding the half shrub species identified in the Division's Vegetation <br />Guidelines, the most dominate shrub growing on the Grassland Reference Area <br />is Plains Prickly pear. It is imperative that the issue of "woody plants" be clarified <br />before the any precise recommendations can be made to address this apparent <br />deficiency and before the Southfield Mine spends money to address this <br />problem. <br />Examination of the species diversity standard reveals that this standard <br />was proposed and approved with no apparent consideration to the site specific <br />conditions found at the Southfield Mine. It has been previously pointed out that <br />from the 1980 cover sampling, Blue grams, the dominate plant on the Grassland <br />Reference Area accounted for 51.83 percent of the total cover. This same <br />species accounted for 41.5 percent of the total cover from the 1987 sampling <br />of this site. Production sampling of this area conducted by the SCS in 1980 <br />revealed that this species accounted for between 57 to 62 percent of the total <br />production of this site. These comparisons amply document that this single <br />species diversity standard has absolutely no bearing on the conditions found a <br />this mine and was apparently proposed and approved without considering the <br />site specific vegetative conditions associated with this site. There is no evidence <br />that the natural conditions of this site would ever satisfy this standard, let alone <br />any of the reclaimed areas. In addition, this standard is inconsistent with the <br />present Vegetation Guidelines of the Division, which set the maximum single <br />species standard based upon the dominate plants growing on the reference <br />areas and thus clearly should be revised. At a minimum there should be no <br />species diversity standard more stringent that conditions associated with the <br />corresponding reference area. It is recommended that the issue of species <br />diversity be addressed to the Division in a technical revision based upon the <br />baseline data available for this site. This submittal should be prepared and <br />15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.