Laserfiche WebLink
• Red Canyon Mine - 1998 AHR Page 2 <br />• <br />Ward Creek has been sampled for TDS and SAR from 1994 through 1997 during the low <br />flow period The following table presents the results of the four years of monitoring: <br /> Total Dissolved Solids (mg/I) Sodium Adsorption Ratio <br /> Measured Predicted Measured Predicted <br />U/S Ward 9/94 60 214 0.67 0.90 <br />UIS Ward 9/95 66 214 0.67 0.90 <br />U/S Ward 10/96 78 214 0.69 0.90 <br />U/S Ward 9/97 72 214 0.73 0.90 <br />D/S Ward 9/94 105 214 1.02 0.90 <br />D/S Ward 9/95 90 214 0.69 0.90 <br />D/S Ward 10/96 112 214 0.72 0.90 <br />D/S Ward 9/97 112 214 0.96 0.90 <br />This sampling confirms that the Red Canyon Mine has not had an adverse impact on the <br />quality of water in Ward Creek. <br />Spring SP-3 was monitored in May. SP-1 was inaccessible due to high water (142.5 cfs) <br />in Ward Creek. In May the field conductivity of SP-3 was 590 uhmos/cm. This value is <br />essentially equal to its historical average of 591 uhmos/cm. <br />The hydrologic monitoring program provides for monitoring to determine if run-off from the <br />mine site has any impact on the water quality in the Carbon Ditch. SP-D is the upstream <br />monitoring point and SP-DA is the downstream monitoring point on the Carbon Ditch. SP- <br />D is located on the Carbon Ditch at a point that would not be impacted by surface run-off <br />from the mine site. SP-DA is located downstream on the Carbon Ditch at a point that could <br />be impacted by surface run-off from the mine site. Both points are monitored during May <br />and September for field parameters and total suspended solids, (TSS). In May the TSS <br />for SP-D and SP-DA was 620 and 470 respectively. In September the TSS for SP-D and <br />SP-DA was 95 and 110 respectively. The TSS measurements indicate that no significant <br />degradation of the quality of water occurred on this stretch of the Carbon Ditch. <br />During the year the return irrigation flow was allowed to accumulate in the pond to again <br />demonstrate this was an adequate source of water for the pond. <br />• <br />